Live data from Hacker News

Plants “panic” when it rains

phys.org

21–30 of 92 posts

Re: Plants “panic” when it rains

#21

It would have been nice to see what particular plants were used in this study. I somehow doubt that all plants react this way. Considering some plants grow under water, others such as sequoias are dependent on fog for their irrigation. Interesting article none the less.

> dependent on fog

dependent on fog in certain locales.

Re: Plants “panic” when it rains

#22
post #4

What is described in the article doesn't fit the definition of panic. I'm torn because maybe I wouldn't have read the article without the needless anthropomorphization. Plants are awesome and interesting to me because they're so planty and not animaly.

Perhaps that's why "panic" is in quotes.

Also keep in mind some believe that a lot of "animalyness" is also "plantyness".

http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20170109-plants-can-see-hear-...

https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/handle/10355/6759

Re: Plants “panic” when it rains

#23
post #4

What is described in the article doesn't fit the definition of panic. I'm torn because maybe I wouldn't have read the article without the needless anthropomorphization. Plants are awesome and interesting to me because they're so planty and not animaly.

Give The Hidden Life of Trees by Peter Wohlleben a read and you might have to blur the border between the two. Highly recommended though - it's a marvellous read and very enlightening.

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/28256439-the-hidden-life...

Re: Plants “panic” when it rains

#24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not all of us use your personal dictionary.

Are there times when "panic" is an appropriate response to something? I mean it is often an understandable response, but I have to agree that my understanding of the term is that is a response to being overwhelmed and responding haphazardly as a result. Is that an accurate description of what's happening? The actual article is a bit light to really understand. I wonder if it's the "chain reaction" across individual t…

Just because it is a hard to name a concrete situation, where panic is a good survival strategy for the individual, it can not be concluded that nature is not ripe with situations, where panic saves the flock.

Also, it would seem that the panic response is evolved for the benefit of the flock, not the individual, as it spreads rapidly; if one person panics, more will follow suit.

Re: Plants “panic” when it rains

#25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not all of us use your personal dictionary.

Are there times when "panic" is an appropriate response to something? I mean it is often an understandable response, but I have to agree that my understanding of the term is that is a response to being overwhelmed and responding haphazardly as a result. Is that an accurate description of what's happening? The actual article is a bit light to really understand. I wonder if it's the "chain reaction" across individual t…

Say, when you are being chased by a lion.

Re: Plants “panic” when it rains

#28
post #4

What is described in the article doesn't fit the definition of panic. I'm torn because maybe I wouldn't have read the article without the needless anthropomorphization. Plants are awesome and interesting to me because they're so planty and not animaly.

I agree. The word "panic" to me implies a certain mental state. Something plants lack.

Re: Plants “panic” when it rains

#29
post #4

What is described in the article doesn't fit the definition of panic. I'm torn because maybe I wouldn't have read the article without the needless anthropomorphization. Plants are awesome and interesting to me because they're so planty and not animaly.

Perhaps that's why "panic" is in quotes. Also keep in mind some believe that a lot of "animalyness" is also "plantyness". http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20170109-plants-can-see-hear-... https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/handle/10355/6759

The quotes were added later by dang, one of the moderators of HN.

Re: Plants “panic” when it rains

#30
The article talks about signals and proteins that activate genes, but it doesn't say what actual response of the plant is being implemented by those genes. I thought maybe this was an omission, but the paper doesn't seem to talk about that either.
Post reply on HN