Isn't this whole valuation thing for companies like Wework a bit problematic. I assume most (all?) of the existing shareholders can't sell their shares even if they wanted when new founding rounds take place. Now we get a new investor, who might acquire a relatively small part of the company for crazy price per share. Then we state that the total value of the company is now total_number_of_shares*crazy_price_per_shar…
WeWTF, Part Deux
21–30 of 126 posts
Re: WeWTF, Part Deux
#22> • Focus on margin expansion vs. growth. We has a differentiated product in the marketplace, and should command a premium. Hm, what exactly does WeWork do that is so unique? Sounds like a regular real estate company except they are targeted towards tech startups.
Re: WeWTF, Part Deux
#23> • Focus on margin expansion vs. growth. We has a differentiated product in the marketplace, and should command a premium. Hm, what exactly does WeWork do that is so unique? Sounds like a regular real estate company except they are targeted towards tech startups.
Re: WeWTF, Part Deux
#24> • Focus on margin expansion vs. growth. We has a differentiated product in the marketplace, and should command a premium. Hm, what exactly does WeWork do that is so unique? Sounds like a regular real estate company except they are targeted towards tech startups.
Re: WeWTF, Part Deux
#25The company name should be highlighted in the text somehow; in its current form, it sounds like an eloquent Gollum's internal monologue in my head. I found myself having to re-read quite a few sentences. "We has gone from unicorn to distressed asset"
I like how some websites format company and person names in a very specific way. Either like [We] or having them bold or in a different colour. Especially in this era of “name your company after a really common daily-use word for maximum confusion and ungoogleability!”.
Don’t forget maximizing the ability to trademark the simple, common daily word and go after anyone using a variant of it when you’re big enough to do so.
Re: WeWTF, Part Deux
#26I had a similar thought a few weeks back. If they're willing to cavalierly expose this craziness in the S1, what else is going on there that we don't know about.
Re: WeWTF, Part Deux
#27The company name should be highlighted in the text somehow; in its current form, it sounds like an eloquent Gollum's internal monologue in my head. I found myself having to re-read quite a few sentences. "We has gone from unicorn to distressed asset"
And yes I read your last sentence in Gollum’s voice and it was perfect. :)
Re: WeWTF, Part Deux
#28The company name should be highlighted in the text somehow; in its current form, it sounds like an eloquent Gollum's internal monologue in my head. I found myself having to re-read quite a few sentences. "We has gone from unicorn to distressed asset"
Re: WeWTF, Part Deux
#29The biggest non-financial red flag for me was the glass office walls. None of WeWork’s non-corporate customers are doing anything remotely sensitive or important. During a downturn, these people will decide to go back to free Starbucks to hang out.
In fairness, you can have the glass frosted
On the other hand, I can't imagine anyone with sensitive information working out of a shared workspace just because ofbthe ease with which a room or whole floor could be bugged.
Re: WeWTF, Part Deux
#30'No Mercy, No Malice'