Live data from Hacker News

Reddit was down for over two hours

reddit.statuspage.io

21–30 of 283 posts

Re: Reddit was down for over two hours

#21
post #14
post #12

Reddit is the only major social media/aggregator I can think of that actually has to go offline for scheduled maintenance still. I can’t imagine the kind of shitshow it must be internally. Imagine if Facebook or Twitter had to go down regularly for “maintenance”. Heads would roll.

they don't make much money so don't have the same redundancy luxuries as other sites

I think they have the resources. Recent example: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-reddit-funding/reddit-val...

Re: Reddit was down for over two hours

#22
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They’re Alexa rank #16 globally - that they’re having trouble monetizing their userbase just means they have absolutely no idea what they’re doing.

That doesn't follow at all. There are all sorts of insanely popular websites which have significant monetization issues (think tumblr, wikipedia). Just because lots of people use something doesn't make them willing to pay for it, and it doesn't make a platform inherently monetizable.

Indeed, also not everybody is trying to squeeze money out of their user base regardless of costs (to popularity, principles...).

Re: Reddit was down for over two hours

#23
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They’re Alexa rank #16 globally - that they’re having trouble monetizing their userbase just means they have absolutely no idea what they’re doing.

That doesn't follow at all. There are all sorts of insanely popular websites which have significant monetization issues (think tumblr, wikipedia). Just because lots of people use something doesn't make them willing to pay for it, and it doesn't make a platform inherently monetizable.

I thought Wikipedia doesn’t have monetization issues, but maybe things have changed? https://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/12/20/cash_rich_wikipedia...

Re: Reddit was down for over two hours

#24
post #21
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

they don't make much money so don't have the same redundancy luxuries as other sites

I think they have the resources. Recent example: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-reddit-funding/reddit-val...

i'm not saying they are completely broke, but they certainly are on the more thrifty side of things compared to most tech companies

Re: Reddit was down for over two hours

#25
post #15
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

they don't make much money so don't have the same redundancy luxuries as other sites

They’re Alexa rank #16 globally - that they’re having trouble monetizing their userbase just means they have absolutely no idea what they’re doing.

I think they just don't sell as much data as something like Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc.

Re: Reddit was down for over two hours

#26
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They’re Alexa rank #16 globally - that they’re having trouble monetizing their userbase just means they have absolutely no idea what they’re doing.

That doesn't follow at all. There are all sorts of insanely popular websites which have significant monetization issues (think tumblr, wikipedia). Just because lots of people use something doesn't make them willing to pay for it, and it doesn't make a platform inherently monetizable.

Any attempt at monetization through the "normal" means, such as increasing the number of ads or selling user data, would completely undermine the things that make Reddit such a valuable site. We've already seen a few examples of Reddit moving toward a more legitimate, financially viable social media model, and each one of those moves has been met with significant backlash. It seems that they're in a lose-lose situation: either run out of money to keep the site running, or lose all their users.

Re: Reddit was down for over two hours

#27
Y'know, the toll that all this activity takes on Reddit's servers gave me an idea for a sort of distributed Reddit. News links and stories assorted into topic-based groups, with the option for users to comment or respond to others' comments in a threaded discussion. It would be completely decentralized and belong to the users, not some central media company. We could call it Users' Network, or USENET for short.

We could implement it with blockchain.

Re: Reddit was down for over two hours

#28
post #15
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

they don't make much money so don't have the same redundancy luxuries as other sites

They’re Alexa rank #16 globally - that they’re having trouble monetizing their userbase just means they have absolutely no idea what they’re doing.

And I wholeheartedly wish Reddit will continue doing what they are doing. As a user, I would vote for scheduled maintenance downtime to many monetization attempts present on other networks.

Re: Reddit was down for over two hours

#29
Number of new posts every 15 minutes in the past 24 hours:

https://imgur.com/a/HqUsYGn

It's interesting to see how it fails. Clearly some users can still post. I'm sure there are things that still work (maybe the phone apps .. got me), but also very clearly, there's a sharp dip in new posts.

Re: Reddit was down for over two hours

#30
post #12

Reddit is the only major social media/aggregator I can think of that actually has to go offline for scheduled maintenance still. I can’t imagine the kind of shitshow it must be internally. Imagine if Facebook or Twitter had to go down regularly for “maintenance”. Heads would roll.

Can't they run in read-only mode during maintenance? That would be a relatively simple workaround, I suppose.
Post reply on HN