From what I've read, the original bug involved malware already installed on the PC using the Steam client to run other code. While I'm not a security expert in any way, that doesn't seem to me like a huge exploit. If the attack requires installing malware on the victim's computer, why not just do the evil stuff directly with that malware? If that's the case and I'm not just remembering it wrong, then I could see why…
Researcher banned on Valve's bug bounty program publishes second Steam 0-day
21–30 of 214 posts
Re: Researcher banned on Valve's bug bounty program publishes second Steam 0-day
#22From what I've read, the original bug involved malware already installed on the PC using the Steam client to run other code. While I'm not a security expert in any way, that doesn't seem to me like a huge exploit. If the attack requires installing malware on the victim's computer, why not just do the evil stuff directly with that malware? If that's the case and I'm not just remembering it wrong, then I could see why…
Re: Researcher banned on Valve's bug bounty program publishes second Steam 0-day
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
"Please don't do thing" does thing gets banned shocked
It wasn't going to be fixed, you can't ship vulnerable software, it's not okay. He was in every right to publish it and to keep shaming Valve.
Re: Researcher banned on Valve's bug bounty program publishes second Steam 0-day
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
It wasn't going to be fixed, you can't ship vulnerable software, it's not okay. He was in every right to publish it and to keep shaming Valve.
And Valve has ever right to ban him from their program, right?
Re: Researcher banned on Valve's bug bounty program publishes second Steam 0-day
#25Re: Researcher banned on Valve's bug bounty program publishes second Steam 0-day
#26From what I've read, the original bug involved malware already installed on the PC using the Steam client to run other code. While I'm not a security expert in any way, that doesn't seem to me like a huge exploit. If the attack requires installing malware on the victim's computer, why not just do the evil stuff directly with that malware? If that's the case and I'm not just remembering it wrong, then I could see why…
"Damn, you watch some weird porn."
Re: Researcher banned on Valve's bug bounty program publishes second Steam 0-day
#27a) Program has scope that doesn't include X b) Researcher reports vulnerability that falls under X c) Since it's out of scope, it's closed as N/A d) Report is locked because company doesn't want to publicly disclose a vulnerability in their system via the Hackerone platform What's the problem here? Just go with normal vulnerability disclosure. Bug bounty programs are a two way street, and respecting the scope is part…
Well, they did go with normal vulnerability disclosure, and were retaliated against. That's not okay.
Obviously it would be better if Valve fixed the issue and gave a (possibly reduced due to out of scope) bounty.
Re: Researcher banned on Valve's bug bounty program publishes second Steam 0-day
#28This story continues to be so sad. Steam is reprising the role of Adobe who, for quite a while, refused to acknowledge that being able to use FlashPlayer as a tool to get you something on Windows was just as bad as breaking FlashPlayer. I heard one Adobe executive say, "Hey you can use a baseball bat to bludgeon someone but that isn't the bat maker's fault is it? If they are forced to make foam bats their product is…
You're beating a dead horse. Flash served a purpose once, and now it's reached end-of-life.
With a foam bat. Just because the flash horse is dead doesn't mean it didn't deserve it's beating or can't continue to be a potent reminder of how bad Adobe was at handling security issues and why other platforms, like Steam, should learn instead of emulate.
Re: Researcher banned on Valve's bug bounty program publishes second Steam 0-day
#29Re: Researcher banned on Valve's bug bounty program publishes second Steam 0-day
#30This story continues to be so sad. Steam is reprising the role of Adobe who, for quite a while, refused to acknowledge that being able to use FlashPlayer as a tool to get you something on Windows was just as bad as breaking FlashPlayer. I heard one Adobe executive say, "Hey you can use a baseball bat to bludgeon someone but that isn't the bat maker's fault is it? If they are forced to make foam bats their product is…
You're beating a dead horse. Flash served a purpose once, and now it's reached end-of-life.