Live data from Hacker News

Yield Curves Invert in U.S., U.K

bloomberg.com

21–30 of 671 posts

Re: Yield Curves Invert in U.S., U.K

#21

Time to get more conservative with your investments. Just moved my retirement accounts from 100% in a 2050 lifecycle fund to 75% in a 2030 lifecycle fund and 25% in just government bonds. Not all investment vehicles have a "lifecycle" fund but its intent is to be appropriately conservative for a target date. As the date grows closer, the fund gets more conservative in order to lessen the risk of sudden swings right b…

Why does low or negative yield bonds mean that you are going to be ok with govt bonds? This is exactly the problem, where bonds are no longer providing interest payments. I agree that being more conservative is probably necessary, however I think other than specific investments and... burying your cash might be the "conservative" options. Bonds were those, and no longer are now.

The bond interest payments are separate from the value of the bond. Which you can sell back at a greater premium and faster than even worrying about maturity.

This is the greatest bull market in bonds of all time and they are starting to behave like cheap deep in-the-money options contracts, which decline slightly in value over time due to theta (time value). Options are fun.

Re: Yield Curves Invert in U.S., U.K

#23

Time to get more conservative with your investments. Just moved my retirement accounts from 100% in a 2050 lifecycle fund to 75% in a 2030 lifecycle fund and 25% in just government bonds. Not all investment vehicles have a "lifecycle" fund but its intent is to be appropriately conservative for a target date. As the date grows closer, the fund gets more conservative in order to lessen the risk of sudden swings right b…

I'm 40% in cash, 50% in S&P and 10% in small-cap. The last few months, all of my contributions have been going into cash, so that when the fall happens, I can hopefully scoop up a deal.

Let’s talk in 10 years and see if your cash will beat my S&P allocation.

Re: Yield Curves Invert in U.S., U.K

#25
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm 40% in cash, 50% in S&P and 10% in small-cap. The last few months, all of my contributions have been going into cash, so that when the fall happens, I can hopefully scoop up a deal.

Let’s talk in 10 years and see if your cash will beat my S&P allocation.

It’s about diversification and timing the market not simply holding cash for 10 years. I also just sold some stock, but I am still 75% in stocks.

Re: Yield Curves Invert in U.S., U.K

#28
post #25
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Let’s talk in 10 years and see if your cash will beat my S&P allocation.

It’s about diversification and timing the market not simply holding cash for 10 years. I also just sold some stock, but I am still 75% in stocks.

"and timing the market"

Hmm. Isn't that known to be impossible?

Re: Yield Curves Invert in U.S., U.K

#29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why does low or negative yield bonds mean that you are going to be ok with govt bonds? This is exactly the problem, where bonds are no longer providing interest payments. I agree that being more conservative is probably necessary, however I think other than specific investments and... burying your cash might be the "conservative" options. Bonds were those, and no longer are now.

The bond interest payments are separate from the value of the bond. Which you can sell back at a greater premium and faster than even worrying about maturity. This is the greatest bull market in bonds of all time and they are starting to behave like cheap deep in-the-money options contracts, which decline slightly in value over time due to theta (time value). Options are fun.

I’m not sure how I get your logic? I do think the US bond yields have a large discrepancy versus other developed market yields, but convexity greater increases as yields fall towards zero. So how is that behavior similar to a deep ITM option?

Re: Yield Curves Invert in U.S., U.K

#30
post #26
post #14

It's a self fulfilling prophesy to an extent because all it takes to cause a recession is to convince everyone there's a recession.

It takes more than that. Recessions are not just the second order effect of people being financially causious.

What more does it take?
Post reply on HN