Live data from Hacker News

High-Tech Solution to Disaster Response May Be Too Good to Be True

nytimes.com

21–23 of 23 posts

Re: High-Tech Solution to Disaster Response May Be Too Good to Be True

#21
My experience with disaster response is a month in Louisiana helping to operate the Rapides Coliseum shelter managed by the American Red Cross after hurricane Katrina in 2005.

Those who are resourceful, can solve problems creatively, and take initiative will lead a disaster response while those granted rank and position tend to spin wheels and control a situation they don't understand. Disasters aren't responded to by staff employees with adequate training. If it's a major disaster, people who have never worked together nor acted in such a capacity are loosely organized together and used to channel resources and effort to victims and their families. Technology absolutely plays a vital role in disaster response but at times it can be a major hindrance. I recall when agents of FEMA came to the coliseum, they asked where the computers and network were. The location did have them, unlike others, but over time they went down and no one has available to maintain them. I explained to the agents that they will have to use forms and manual entry the old fashioned way. They just looked at each other and left. Several days passed. Then, FEMA returned with a mobile command center, featuring computers and satellite communication.

The experience didn't surprise me but made me realize how dependent people are on technology and how unprepared they are to handle circumstances they haven't trained for.

Re: High-Tech Solution to Disaster Response May Be Too Good to Be True

#22
"In classes that fall, Mr. Wani and other graduate students turned the problem into a project. Using crowdsourced ground-shaking reports from previous earthquakes, they trained a computer system to predict the areas of greatest impact so that responders would not have to rely on 911 calls."

After a major earthquake, I seriously doubt competent emergency dispatch operators will be proactively sending critically-understaffed ambulances, fire engines, and police to a location identified by old, crowd-sourced cell phone shake data cobbled together for a grad-school project.

Not that emergency systems IT is not without challenges: old (often third party) technology, overly stove-piped administrative domains, and just plain old out-of-date technical skills. In other words, there's lots of low hanging fruit for bright young programmers looking to serve their community!

Re: High-Tech Solution to Disaster Response May Be Too Good to Be True

#23
post #16
post #12

> Our mission is not to make money only,” Mr. Wani said, later adding, “We’re trying to save the world.” People should probably watch Silicon Valley before giving interviews. Repeating satire verbatim isn’t a good look.

But isn't emergency response literally about saving people?

Is One Concern responding to emergencies, or sucking up a quarter million dollars a year in funding to paint a map using "AI"? That's a lot of actual boots on the ground, saving people.
Post reply on HN