I'm one of the authors of the bot, AMA
Is the bot going for game-theory-optimal play, or trying to exploit weaknesses in other players?
21–30 of 407 posts
I'm one of the authors of the bot, AMA
Is the bot going for game-theory-optimal play, or trying to exploit weaknesses in other players?
I'm one of the authors of the bot, AMA
Are there any ethical considerations relating to the prospect of use of this bot for cheating in real-money games? Either from your internal team or after public replication?
I'm one of the authors of the bot, AMA
Are any papers available yet? Is the bot going for game-theory-optimal play, or trying to exploit weaknesses in other players?
It's going for game-theory-optimal play. It doesn't adapt to its opponents' observed weaknesses. But I think it's cool to show that you don't need to adapt to opponent weaknesses to win at poker at the highest levels. You just need to not have any weaknesses yourself.
I'm one of the authors of the bot, AMA
The article makes it sound like the AI is trained by evaluating results of decisions it makes on a per-hand basis. Is there any sense in which the AI learns about strategies that depend upon multiple hands? I’m thinking of bluffing/detecting bluffs and identifying recent patterns, which is something human poker players talk about.
That said, it did train by playing against itself (before the experiment against the humans began).
How long until a slightly worse version of this model is reverse engineered and appears at every table in online poker?
I'm one of the authors of the bot, AMA
Can you share some about what strategies the bot prefers and how these compare with common professional human strategies?
I'm one of the authors of the bot, AMA
How long until a slightly worse version of this model is reverse engineered and appears at every table in online poker?