Earlier quoted context omitted.
To me the scope seems rather narrow, and the technical requirements about on par with a mailing list.
Their sole innovation over that is that they realized neutrality and being a third party is valuable because of regulation. Haha, this is pretty clever.
“Banclist.com is probably the most lucrative direct messaging platform”
21–30 of 77 posts
Re: “Banclist.com is probably the most lucrative direct messaging platform”
#22Are there any effective strategies for searching out profitable parasitic niches like this? Looking around the corners of big heavily regulated industries? Healthcare, real estate, finance?
Taking a job in an industry to get access to its seedy underbelly isn't super appealing to most founders, but for some ossified industries there's really no other way to find those golden opportunities.
Oh, and be patient. Practice being a mouthless set of ears.
Re: “Banclist.com is probably the most lucrative direct messaging platform”
#23This is an example of what happens when a field is over-regulated. You have these obtuse solutions working around a problem that is only hard because of lawyers and 500 regulations to "protect investors". People were able to hack together exchanges for crypto-coins. The only thing that stands in the way of doing this for private stock/tiny companies is excessive regulation. I'm not saying we want the whole crypto exp…
Re: “Banclist.com is probably the most lucrative direct messaging platform”
#24Are there any effective strategies for searching out profitable parasitic niches like this? Looking around the corners of big heavily regulated industries? Healthcare, real estate, finance?
Re: “Banclist.com is probably the most lucrative direct messaging platform”
#25It actually was a little difficult to figure out what this business is about from their website, but their LinkedIn is comprehensive enough: “Overview Non-publicly held banks are facing increasing risks when they maintain a private list of their shareholders. Sharing unpublished information about the bank’s stock with a few shareholders exposes the bank, its management and directors to potentially serious liability.…
Why banks specifically? Doesn't every private company with multiple shareholders have the same problem? Or is the legal situation for a bank different?
Re: “Banclist.com is probably the most lucrative direct messaging platform”
#26This is an example of what happens when a field is over-regulated. You have these obtuse solutions working around a problem that is only hard because of lawyers and 500 regulations to "protect investors". People were able to hack together exchanges for crypto-coins. The only thing that stands in the way of doing this for private stock/tiny companies is excessive regulation. I'm not saying we want the whole crypto exp…
What about BancList indicates that the field is over-regulated
Re: “Banclist.com is probably the most lucrative direct messaging platform”
#27This is an example of what happens when a field is over-regulated. You have these obtuse solutions working around a problem that is only hard because of lawyers and 500 regulations to "protect investors". People were able to hack together exchanges for crypto-coins. The only thing that stands in the way of doing this for private stock/tiny companies is excessive regulation. I'm not saying we want the whole crypto exp…
People were able to hack together exchanges for crypto-coins. The only thing that stands in the way of doing this for private stock/tiny companies is excessive regulation.
Crypto exchanges are examples of how to create a financial system that lacks security (both the technical and financial kinds) and trust. It's an example of how NOT to do things. Crypto exchanges act as broker, exchange, clearinghouse, depository and trustee. And do none of these very well.
In the regulated world, exchanges do not hold your assets. There is nothing "on deposit". Your broker (who holds your cash assets instead) is insured. Brokers don't even typically hold your securities, they just track your positions. The security assets themselves are held at depository institutions. Etc, etc. This system is not by accident. It was developed through a long history of trial and error to minimize the impact of fraud, abuse, bankruptcies, etc.
I'll be the first to recognize that most financial regulators have been very slow to adopt to the crypto world. That's because so many crypto tokens are either not securities or quasi securities and thus defy easy classification. Thus some old rules don't really apply well. They're also paranoid about money laundering, which doesn't help.
The software aspects of setting up exchanges are challenging but ultimately not the hard part. I guess my point is that just because something is easy to do doesn't mean it should be done.
Re: “Banclist.com is probably the most lucrative direct messaging platform”
#28Are there any effective strategies for searching out profitable parasitic niches like this? Looking around the corners of big heavily regulated industries? Healthcare, real estate, finance?
From the outside? Probably not.
Re: “Banclist.com is probably the most lucrative direct messaging platform”
#29> Thus BancList (spelling absolutely intentional, because even the K is regulated and I am absolutely not joking about that fact). No, he's not joking. Even the font size is regulated. I ran into that as an employee of a commodities trader. I'm not sure if the choice of font is regulated but it wouldn't be surprising.
When I worked on a site for mutual funds years ago, we couldn't use green-color text because it could be considered as implying that the person reading it would make money.
Re: “Banclist.com is probably the most lucrative direct messaging platform”
#30Eek! I wouldn't trust them with my data if I was a bank. They haven't updated their server since 2013. All of the versions listed in that header have major vulns. This is a disaster waiting to happen.