Live data from Hacker News

Why Google+ Failed

onezero.medium.com

21–30 of 375 posts

Re: Why Google+ Failed

#21
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Any article there does not deserve to be read. You are not missing anything

That's not fair. Medium's content is community contributed. There's a lot of value in there. Let's not throw the baby with the water.

if the author cares so little about their readers that they choose to distribute their content on medium, there's a good chance that content isn't worth reading.

Re: Why Google+ Failed

#22
post #8

Come on, it's Google. They would have killed it someday anyway. Had it lived longer, there would only be more angry users that wouldn't have got their data out.

Will they kill Gmail or YouTube in the future as well in your opinion?

Re: Why Google+ Failed

#23
Instagram is very unidirectional. So is wechat (the instagram-like feature within China).

The whole "influencer" phenomenon (originating in the Chinese KOL - Key Opinion Leaders - phenomenon) is specifically engineered to be a unidirectional mechanism.

In fact, Snapchat tried to do the same with "Discover", which ended up in Google Plus territory. It was not very usable.

Re: Why Google+ Failed

#25
post #8

Come on, it's Google. They would have killed it someday anyway. Had it lived longer, there would only be more angry users that wouldn't have got their data out.

Will they kill Gmail or YouTube in the future as well in your opinion?

Killing Gmail was probably on the roadmap when Wave was introduced.

Re: Why Google+ Failed

#26

No business plan, no vision, lack of leadership, tried to copy Twitter and Facebook. Even Yahoo 360 was better.

Circles was a nice feature, which however was promptly matched by Facebook. You can't win on features in this market.

Re: Why Google+ Failed

#28
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's not fair. Medium's content is community contributed. There's a lot of value in there. Let's not throw the baby with the water.

if the author cares so little about their readers that they choose to distribute their content on medium, there's a good chance that content isn't worth reading.

What's so bad about it?

Re: Why Google+ Failed

#29

>Project Hancock was the internal code name of the project designed to do this. It was going to set up a Google Plus account for every Google user. This is actually much more complicated than it sounds; it took a team of engineers somewhere around three months to accomplish it. What this bit glosses over is the PR disaster that was Google forcing Google+ down the throats of its unwilling users. For example, for years…

That's what you get when some team's bonus depends on conversion rate.

Re: Why Google+ Failed

#30
post #9

I am sorry for the off topic comment but I can't even read this article because medium now shows me a "Sign up for an extra read" popup without any way of closing it. Medium is going so down the tubes, it's become impossible for me to read anything there. Does anyone have a way to bypass the sign up pop up?

search for the extension "make medium readable again". I've come to see medium and google captcha as mental filters for judging the overall technical competence of the firm deploying them.
Post reply on HN