Live data from Hacker News

Google to Acquire Looker

cloud.google.com

21–30 of 175 posts

Re: Google to Acquire Looker

#21
"Looker -- SQL for Dummies"

Before you downvote me, these are not mine words but actually from a Looker engineer I asked to summarize the product. I don't know how accurate the quote is, but it stuck with me.

Also, congrats to the team I guess. Is an acquisition an accomplishment or just a decision?

Re: Google to Acquire Looker

#22

I'm a huge fan of Looker, but I'm not sure how I feel about this news. The best parts of Looker: - It connects directly to your existing data warehouse. Most BI tools suck in your data into their datastore; Looker queries your database directly. If you wanted Looker to cache results for performance reasons, you could set up a dedicated schema in Redshift for example and only give write privileges to that one schema.…

[deleted]

Re: Google to Acquire Looker

#23
post #13

Smart move. Google wants to own the entire data infrastructure. Alooma (acquired in February) gets your data from various sources into BigQuery, then all the analysis is done in Looker. Unfortunate news for non-Looker users: Supposedly Alooma stopped supporting Redshift and Snowflake integrations following the acquisition, since those compete with BigQuery. If you're using Looker with Redshift or Snowflake you should…

I doubt you need to be concerned about Snowflake:

https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/data-analytics/announ...

Re: Google to Acquire Looker

#24
Me and My team have been working on a Looker alternative for a couple of years. Hope this is the right time to give a pitch. We as a company love to assist our clients with a free consultation in understanding their data better. This will take you to the direct demo: https://demo.katoai.co/login?email=demo@katoai.co&password=k...

I can talk a lot about it if anyone is interested.

Re: Google to Acquire Looker

#27
post #10
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That would definitely help Santa Cruz’s rental market

It would definitely revitalize the coast. But at what price? Can you imagine the gridlock on State Highway 17 (and the Pac HWY)? If I sat in the governator’s office, I’d push for a commuter line from the South Bay to St Cruz. That would be so much more beneficial than the HSR to no-where we wasted 70 billion on.

I can only imagine the ecological and financial challenges of putting rail in over the Santa Cruz mountains but would love to see it

Re: Google to Acquire Looker

#28
As someone on the BQ -> Looker Stack, I'm very very happy about this news. I also think their going to not have pricing pressure for a while as Google may want them to keep taking market share away from Tableau, Qlik, etc.

Re: Google to Acquire Looker

#29
post #7

I'm curious to see how Google handle acquiring a company which requires some fairly high touch sales. Looker is a fantastic tool, but its not something which is useful from day one, and at least currently has a high enough price tag attached to it that they involve a lot of sales engineering in getting new customers to a point where they're able to query data they care about.

> at least currently has a high enough price tag attached to it

They don’t have a price on their website. Can anyone here provide what price points a medium-large company is looking(no pun intended) at?

Re: Google to Acquire Looker

#30
post #21

"Looker -- SQL for Dummies" Before you downvote me, these are not mine words but actually from a Looker engineer I asked to summarize the product. I don't know how accurate the quote is, but it stuck with me. Also, congrats to the team I guess. Is an acquisition an accomplishment or just a decision?

I can confirm that. I spent some time looking at it when the entire sales team at the SaaS startup I was at insisted on it. I'll admit, I have yet to see a BI tool that was this easy. I tried selling them first on a self-hosted instance of Apache Caravel, but it turns out ANY SQL is too much.
Post reply on HN