Live data from Hacker News

Leonardo Da Vinci’s To-Do List

mymodernmet.com

21–29 of 29 posts

Re: Leonardo Da Vinci’s To-Do List

#21

I was inspired by Da Vinci in my younger days to become a modern Renaissance Man. Then I discovered that the depth of knowledge in any given field had become far too deep to ever hope at becoming expert in more than one. Sure you can still make art, and study mathematics and astronomy, and so forth, but it's almost impossible to reach the level of mastery that Da Vinci reached in his day. No one hires Renaissance Men…

A more modest goal would be to remain open to the wonders of fields you know little about.

As one example close to my heart: there is a streak within the tech community that rejects anything that isn't "pure" science. To quote the only good joke from the Big Bang Theory: "Oh, the humanities!".

If you read Feynman, one of the more modern Renaissance Men, you will see this streak in action. He deeply appreciate fields rather far from physics, including linguistics, music, and art, and even succeeded in some of them independent of his main career. He also showed that "appreciation for" does not require uncritical believe, specifically minting the term "cargo-cult science" for what he saw as a weakness in the field.

Re: Leonardo Da Vinci’s To-Do List

#22

Anyone else in history who seems universally liked? Da Vinci seems popular among everyone.

Feynman and Einstein comes to mind.

People alleged Feynman was sexist, and they even protested, so I'm sure there are some people who don't like him.

Re: Leonardo Da Vinci’s To-Do List

#23

I was inspired by Da Vinci in my younger days to become a modern Renaissance Man. Then I discovered that the depth of knowledge in any given field had become far too deep to ever hope at becoming expert in more than one. Sure you can still make art, and study mathematics and astronomy, and so forth, but it's almost impossible to reach the level of mastery that Da Vinci reached in his day. No one hires Renaissance Men…

There has never been a human being who "knew everything" in recorded history, though there have occasionally been those who were given the title.

The goal isn't to become an expert and know everything, the best people tend to be the "T" shaped, or "π" shaped in HR terms. Where you know an extensive amount about a small number of subjects and know a small amount about an extensive number of subjects. Strive to be able to carry on a 5 minute conversation about anything and days of conversation about a few things.

Re: Leonardo Da Vinci’s To-Do List

#24

I was inspired by Da Vinci in my younger days to become a modern Renaissance Man. Then I discovered that the depth of knowledge in any given field had become far too deep to ever hope at becoming expert in more than one. Sure you can still make art, and study mathematics and astronomy, and so forth, but it's almost impossible to reach the level of mastery that Da Vinci reached in his day. No one hires Renaissance Men…

I bet that's what they said in Da Vinci's time.

Something else that is sometimes forgotten - LDV's notebooks were for his personal use; none (that I recall) were ever published during his lifetime, and then they were "lost" (squirreled away by others would be a better term - ie, "lost" as in "stuffed in an attic in the back corner and forgotten about until passed - yet again - after the owner died") for a long period before being rediscovered and finally published much later - more for curiosity sake than for any knowledge contained in them, as most of it was out of date and/or rediscovered by then.

I doubt that he would have cared, either; his interest in bettering his knowledge and more were for his own sake and nobody else's. Many of the things he noted down and learned, then expanded upon, were actually well-known concepts and such that just hadn't been "written down", or if they had, they were generally done in a far inferior fashion.

Ultimately, though, they were for his own study, and maybe for the few others he (possibly) showed them to (students and/or people he asked questions of would be my guess) - to convey ideas very clearly, as if the actual device or object in question were in front of him or another. Most of the prior attempts at conveying such information could be termed more as "schematic" than as representative of actual form. Some weren't even that clear.

As others have noted, I wouldn't bother with trying to become an expert in everything today - that's a near impossibility. Rather, focus on bettering your knowledge about a wide variety of subjects that interest you. Learn how to apply knowledge from one area to solve problems in another domain. Learn how to integrate knowledge across domains to also solve problems, or come up with creative solutions or further ideas in another domain. In short, treat learning and creativity more like a child; play with it, and enjoy it.

That's a large part of what it means to be a "Renaissance Man"; to me, it doesn't have anything to do with being an expert in any number of particular fields, or even one field. Rather, to me it means having a broad knowledge base, and finding joy in applying that to learn in other areas and solving problems new to me using that - and, when I can or when asked - passing on what I have learned.

Re: Leonardo Da Vinci’s To-Do List

#25

I was inspired by Da Vinci in my younger days to become a modern Renaissance Man. Then I discovered that the depth of knowledge in any given field had become far too deep to ever hope at becoming expert in more than one. Sure you can still make art, and study mathematics and astronomy, and so forth, but it's almost impossible to reach the level of mastery that Da Vinci reached in his day. No one hires Renaissance Men…

Is it worth it to learn and possess the knowledge of a renaissance man without making money from that knowledge?

Of course it is! Finding joy in the learning and application of knowledge - for it's own sake, and for applying it to other areas of study, learning, or practical use - that was a key part of being a "Renaissance Man" (as we term it today); making money is - or should be - secondary to those goals.

Re: Leonardo Da Vinci’s To-Do List

#26

Anyone else in history who seems universally liked? Da Vinci seems popular among everyone.

Feynman and Einstein comes to mind.

There are certainly at least some people who still have issues with Einstein because of his support for socialism.

I think in general Da Vinci is viewed so well today because distance in time tends to reduce everyone famous to a stereotype of themselves.

Most people know the stereotype of Da Vinci, and won't be able to tell you much about him beyond that. Einstein is rapidly heading that way too - I'd expect the proportion of people that knew of Einsteins support of socialism today is relatively low, and that even fewer are aware of his very strong opposition to Menachem Begin, for example.

Re: Leonardo Da Vinci’s To-Do List

#29

I was inspired by Da Vinci in my younger days to become a modern Renaissance Man. Then I discovered that the depth of knowledge in any given field had become far too deep to ever hope at becoming expert in more than one. Sure you can still make art, and study mathematics and astronomy, and so forth, but it's almost impossible to reach the level of mastery that Da Vinci reached in his day. No one hires Renaissance Men…

We are all renaissance people by his day's standards
Post reply on HN