Live data from Hacker News

The Saltiest Users on HN

hackersalt.com

21–30 of 92 posts

Re: The Saltiest Users on HN

#22
The scoring heuristic could use some work; I've already encountered multiple "salty" comments along the lines of "That sounds awful", with a sympathetic tone, probably tagged because of the word "awful".

Re: The Saltiest Users on HN

#23

I love this! I'm sort of proud to note that my salt score is -0.08, with my saltiest comment being: The iPad and iPhone are especially dangerous when it comes to accidental downvoting. Separating or enlarging the arrows would help those of us with fat fingers. However, (and this will apparently add to my salt score ;)), I'm curious how a comments like these get rated as expressing a negative sentiment?: Out of curios…

I have the same score! Apparently I was a little salty in summer of 2011 and 2012, other than that I'm a pretty sweet guy.

Re: The Saltiest Users on HN

#27
It is my feeling that sentiment analysis has a ways to go. Here are a few of the comments I've made that the system has described as among my saltiest:

Oh, sorry, "nm" means "nanometer" to me, but of course nautical miles. (Score: -0.5. Comment is entirely taking responsibility for misinterpreting someone)

Well, if he was trying 1M combinations every 40 seconds, for $7 per hour, and he didn't need to use hundreds of dollars per hour of commute time, let's say 10 hours = $70. That's 900M combinations per hour, so 9B combinations in 10 hours. If he was trying combinations using upper-case characters, lower-case characters, numbers, and let's say 20 symbols, that's 82 possible combinations for each one. We'd expect him to find the password after exhausting half of the search set, so we want log base 82 of 18B. That suggests 5 characters. If he let's say just used lower-case characters and numbers, that's log base 36 of 18B, which suggests 7 characters. (Score: -0.32. Comment is 100% technical, with no meaningful sentiment.)

Sorry, I submitted this article earlier with the wrong link. (Score: -0.27. System appears to regard legitimate, largely bloodless apologies as salty.)

Note that the article is from approximately 20 years ago. (Score: -0.24. This is to some degree a critical comment, but it's a short, straightforward statement of fact.)

Probably too late to reply, but I mean things like :ets.method or :queue.whatever. (Score: -0.20. Probably it's cueing off the first phrase?)

Re: The Saltiest Users on HN

#28

The first list is mostly people who I don't recognize, and assume are uncommon posters, where one or two bad comments put them on the "saltiest" list. The other two top lists are more interesting, because while there is a lot of salty people in there I recognize, a bunch of people make the list solely based on total prolific amount of comments. tptacek, of course, as well as literally all of the HN moderators. Appare…

I would worry about my methodology if I saw dang, who basically only ever weighs in to politely tell people to be less salty, in the #2 spot on my "Total Salt Score" list.

What's your definition of 'salty'? I think you can definitely be politely salty, and dang's comments are all saying (at least) 'don't do that' which seems to fit.

Re: The Saltiest Users on HN

#30

I love this! I'm sort of proud to note that my salt score is -0.08, with my saltiest comment being: The iPad and iPhone are especially dangerous when it comes to accidental downvoting. Separating or enlarging the arrows would help those of us with fat fingers. However, (and this will apparently add to my salt score ;)), I'm curious how a comments like these get rated as expressing a negative sentiment?: Out of curios…

For somoeone who goes by "crankylinuxusuer" I need to work on this! I only got a -.06
Post reply on HN