Boeing 737 Max pilots complained to feds for months about suspected safety flaw
21–30 of 307 posts
Re: Boeing 737 Max pilots complained to feds for months about suspected safety flaw
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
Wow, the incognito mode blocking is something I've never seen before. Disgusting. Hopefully Google corrects the bug which they are using to discover the incognito mode status.
They are working on that actually, planned to be in Chrome 74 and then enabled by default in Chrome 76.
Re: Boeing 737 Max pilots complained to feds for months about suspected safety flaw
#23US media. Why do I need always a VPN from Europe? Beeing GDPR compliant is not rocket science. "Unfortunately, our site is unavailable to European Union visitors... blablabla". UPDATE: And this news website even detects if I use incognito mode: "To continue reading, please disable private/incognito mode, log in, or enroll as a member" omg
> Beeing GDPR compliant is not rocket science. Its also not free. Rational companies will apply a cost benefit analysis to GDPR compliance and some of them will determine it is better to block EU visitors than to do the GDPR work.
Re: Boeing 737 Max pilots complained to feds for months about suspected safety flaw
#24US media. Why do I need always a VPN from Europe? Beeing GDPR compliant is not rocket science. "Unfortunately, our site is unavailable to European Union visitors... blablabla". UPDATE: And this news website even detects if I use incognito mode: "To continue reading, please disable private/incognito mode, log in, or enroll as a member" omg
> Beeing GDPR compliant is not rocket science. Its also not free. Rational companies will apply a cost benefit analysis to GDPR compliance and some of them will determine it is better to block EU visitors than to do the GDPR work.
This is a real cost of the GDPR. If enforcement ticks up more companies will do the cost/benefit and some will decide to withdraw from the European internet. That leads to a more fractured web.
Re: Boeing 737 Max pilots complained to feds for months about suspected safety flaw
#25After the Lion Air crash the FAA released a Emergency Airworthiness Directive, these five comments are in response to that directive. That differentiates it from pilots that had a negative run-in with MCAS or other defects in the 737 Max 8 (which would be significant news).
This article might inform you pilots are unhappy, but that fact has been widely circulated elsewhere since the Lion Air crash. The fact that five pilots submitted official comments doesn't add to what we knew.
These comments for example wouldn't have helped inform the FAA's decisions, since the FAA told the pilots about the issues in the Emergency Airworthiness Directive that these comments are based upon.
Re: Boeing 737 Max pilots complained to feds for months about suspected safety flaw
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
Wow, the incognito mode blocking is something I've never seen before. Disgusting. Hopefully Google corrects the bug which they are using to discover the incognito mode status.
They are working on that actually, planned to be in Chrome 74 and then enabled by default in Chrome 76.
I was able to eventually get past it using ABP by adding rules to block https://courier-api.dallasnews.com/v1/paywall/* and www.dallasnews.com###courier-iframe
Re: Boeing 737 Max pilots complained to feds for months about suspected safety flaw
#27> The News found at least five complaints about the Boeing model in a federal database where pilots can voluntarily report about aviation incidents without fear of repercussions. Is this a lot?
Yes. Recalls with autos happen more often with a lot less. Consider the amount of cars out there. It only takes a few to put one in play.
eg. search for ACN 1337942 here https://asrs.arc.nasa.gov/search/dbol.html (i'm too dumb to figure out how to link to a specific nasa report), and there's a report about the captain's side AOA vane being busted and causing the captain's stick shaker to vibrate constantly.
edit: here's another one: 1097906, talking about inconsistent airspeed readings between the captain and first officer and then on descent, the airspeed readings went super wonky and the plane pitched nose down.
Re: Boeing 737 Max pilots complained to feds for months about suspected safety flaw
#28US media. Why do I need always a VPN from Europe? Beeing GDPR compliant is not rocket science. "Unfortunately, our site is unavailable to European Union visitors... blablabla". UPDATE: And this news website even detects if I use incognito mode: "To continue reading, please disable private/incognito mode, log in, or enroll as a member" omg
Well US media hates GDPR. Its all a circular reference
Re: Boeing 737 Max pilots complained to feds for months about suspected safety flaw
#29> The News found at least five complaints about the Boeing model in a federal database where pilots can voluntarily report about aviation incidents without fear of repercussions. Is this a lot?
Re: Boeing 737 Max pilots complained to feds for months about suspected safety flaw
#301. There have been 865 737 related ASRS reports since 1/1/2018
2. I don't know how to quickly separate out 737-MAX reports from the non 737-MAX reports, as the ASRS database doesn't include 737-MAX as an airplane type! From scanning, I can say that there are more than five MAX related reports, though.
[1] All 865 737 reports since 1/1/2018
CSV - http://s000.tinyupload.com/index.php?file_id=546686797940621...
DOC - http://s000.tinyupload.com/index.php?file_id=726497188798253...
[2] Airplane model filter with no MAX option: https://imgur.com/a/09rRtzX
[3] ASRS database: https://titan-server.arc.nasa.gov/ASRSPublicQueryWizard/Quer...
[4] Document linked in the article with plane models listed under 737-800 or 737-Next Generation Undifferentiated https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5766398-ASRS-Reports...