Live data from Hacker News

Ask YC: "Can a 40 year old, married with 3 children, start a start-up?"

news.ycombinator.com

21–30 of 77 posts

Re: Ask YC: "Can a 40 year old, married with 3 children, start a start-up?"

#21
post #13

NO! You have already failed by the fact that you need to ask the question. If you need someone else to convince you to do a startup you are in the wrong game.

A fair point!

Actually what I was attempting here was to try and question the thinking behind when we can and can't do things that we wish to do.

I don't need anyone to convince me, I was trying to challenge the general perceptions of when you can start a start-up.

I never think a question is a 'stupid question', and I also don't think asking a question is a failure.

Re: Ask YC: "Can a 40 year old, married with 3 children, start a start-up?"

#22
post #20
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are 'fail' and 'can't' words in your vocabulary? I assume so, as you clearly understand my comments. Something more thoughtful would help! ;)

"Something more thoughtful would help!" It may not have been very profound, but that was the most thoughtful response I could give. I believe the single biggest differentiator between success and failure is not giving up. Removing the words "can't" and "fail" from your vocabulary is a very simple illustration of this philosophy. (Lighten up, it's metaphorical, not literal.)

'I believe the single biggest differentiator between success and failure is not giving up. Removing the words "can't" and "fail" from your vocabulary is a very simple illustration of this philosophy.'

I agree totally - sorry if I seemed uptight! (it's late here in the UK!)

You don't go along with the age thing then?

Re: Ask YC: "Can a 40 year old, married with 3 children, start a start-up?"

#23
post #22
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Something more thoughtful would help!" It may not have been very profound, but that was the most thoughtful response I could give. I believe the single biggest differentiator between success and failure is not giving up. Removing the words "can't" and "fail" from your vocabulary is a very simple illustration of this philosophy. (Lighten up, it's metaphorical, not literal.)

'I believe the single biggest differentiator between success and failure is not giving up. Removing the words "can't" and "fail" from your vocabulary is a very simple illustration of this philosophy.' I agree totally - sorry if I seemed uptight! (it's late here in the UK!) You don't go along with the age thing then?

Not at all. I'm older than you and having a ball.

(By the way, it looks like you're getting lots of excellent feedback in this thread. Welcome aboard!)

Re: Ask YC: "Can a 40 year old, married with 3 children, start a start-up?"

#24
My dad did. I was the third of three and one year old when my dad started a business to manufacture a high-quality version of a (then) novel electric motor which he designed and patented. He and his partner built the company to about 50 employees and then sold the business to a large industrial conglomerate a few years later.

I'm now 36, happily married with three kids of my own. I'm bgeinning something along the 37 Signals route - 10 hours a week until I have critical mass.

Overall, I must grudgingly admit that youth has the advantage, so I think us oldsters have to leverage the advantages we do have - experience, money and connections.

Re: Ask YC: "Can a 40 year old, married with 3 children, start a start-up?"

#26
Would highly recommend you read Barry Moltz's: "You Need to be a Little Crazy":

http://www.amazon.com/You-Need-Be-Little-Crazy/dp/079318018X...

I'm 39.5 with 3 kids and working at my 3rd startup. You make sacrifices and I'd be lying if I said my marriage hasn't been strained at times mostly due to financial worries.

It really comes down to this:

“If you bring forth what is within you, what is within you will save you. If you do not bring forth what is within you, what is within you will destroy you.”

You have to bring it forth!

Cheers

Re: Ask YC: "Can a 40 year old, married with 3 children, start a start-up?"

#27
post #23
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

'I believe the single biggest differentiator between success and failure is not giving up. Removing the words "can't" and "fail" from your vocabulary is a very simple illustration of this philosophy.' I agree totally - sorry if I seemed uptight! (it's late here in the UK!) You don't go along with the age thing then?

Not at all. I'm older than you and having a ball. (By the way, it looks like you're getting lots of excellent feedback in this thread. Welcome aboard!)

Thanks for the comments. I hope to be at that ball soon, perhaps in a nice new tux!

Re: Ask YC: "Can a 40 year old, married with 3 children, start a start-up?"

#28

My dad did. I was the third of three and one year old when my dad started a business to manufacture a high-quality version of a (then) novel electric motor which he designed and patented. He and his partner built the company to about 50 employees and then sold the business to a large industrial conglomerate a few years later. I'm now 36, happily married with three kids of my own. I'm bgeinning something along the 37…

Thank-you and good luck.

My father also started a business (furniture manufacturer!), way back in 1977, when I was only 9.

What I have noticed is that the phrase over here (in England - maybe applies in the US), 'You only get out what you put in'.

Re: Ask YC: "Can a 40 year old, married with 3 children, start a start-up?"

#29
Probably. Don't know your situation, and I'm not 40 anyway, so take everything I say with a grain of salt.

One thing I've noticed, having worked for startups with older founders: when you're over 35, it's to your advantage to start a different kind of company. When you're in your early 20s, it makes sense to swing for the fences with a new consumer idea that's wildly innovative and nobody really understands. That way, your lack of experience isn't really a drawback (nobody knows what they're doing, so the fact that you don't know either isn't a significant problem) and your youthful energy lets you discover and explore the market faster than all your older competitors. Plus, much of your peer group consists of people who are open to new ideas and will be "growing into" your market. You can understand them better than older folks. And you can live on less money, which is important, because new markets usually don't involve much cash.

When you're over 35, it makes more sense to leverage your existing experience and network and go into a field close to your existing job - often, your first customer will be your last employer. Start small with something you can sell for cash, quickly, and then leverage your network to expand to other customers. You're protected from all the young tykes because you know the market and technology better than they do, and you fend off the big companies by concentrating on a niche that's unprofitable for them to devote much attention to.

This, of course, depends upon having experience and contacts to leverage. If you spent your whole career working as a janitor, it may be pretty difficult to start a company, unless you've discovered a new more efficient way to mop floors. But if you've spent your whole career as a sysadmin, it makes a lot of sense to build server administration software that does your job, only better.

Re: Ask YC: "Can a 40 year old, married with 3 children, start a start-up?"

#30
post #28

My dad did. I was the third of three and one year old when my dad started a business to manufacture a high-quality version of a (then) novel electric motor which he designed and patented. He and his partner built the company to about 50 employees and then sold the business to a large industrial conglomerate a few years later. I'm now 36, happily married with three kids of my own. I'm bgeinning something along the 37…

Thank-you and good luck. My father also started a business (furniture manufacturer!), way back in 1977, when I was only 9. What I have noticed is that the phrase over here (in England - maybe applies in the US), 'You only get out what you put in'.

The US version might be "you reap what you sow," which I like because crops produce more than what they were planted with.

Pick a venture that lets you get out more than you put in, eh?

Post reply on HN