Live data from Hacker News

DuckDuckGo will use Apple Maps

spreadprivacy.com

21–30 of 496 posts

Re: DuckDuckGo will use Apple Maps

#21
post #11

I could see a future where DDG gets acquired by Apple.

Separate discussion from last week, most argue against it https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18816748

I'd argue for it. Apple is missing a search engine, has deep-enough pockets and resources to build its own engine if DDG API contracts were stopped, and is favored by people who value their privacy.

Re: DuckDuckGo will use Apple Maps

#22
post #3

Not in the US - so realize that not everyone experiences this - but I've never had a mapping software be so terrible as Apple maps, led me completely out of the way and over a toll bridge that I didn't need to go over. Trip was over an hour longer than it needed to be. I'll definitely still be using !maps to get google maps on duckduckgo.

It's regional. For a long time (in internet time), Apple Maps were clearly inferior to Google Maps. These days, it's more nuanced. In some geographies they have parity. In a select few, Apple is ahead. For most, though, Google is better. For speed and privacy reasons, I check Apple Maps first. If I don't find what I'm looking for, then I go to Google Maps and follow up by force-quitting Google Maps when I'm done.

Alternative: in countries where Apple maps suck, try Here maps: great UI and offline maps.

Re: DuckDuckGo will use Apple Maps

#23
post #3

Not in the US - so realize that not everyone experiences this - but I've never had a mapping software be so terrible as Apple maps, led me completely out of the way and over a toll bridge that I didn't need to go over. Trip was over an hour longer than it needed to be. I'll definitely still be using !maps to get google maps on duckduckgo.

It's pretty regional. It's less confused about Dublin's public transport system these days than Google is, say, so I've started to use it more.

Re: DuckDuckGo will use Apple Maps

#26
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Separate discussion from last week, most argue against it https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18816748

I'd argue for it. Apple is missing a search engine, has deep-enough pockets and resources to build its own engine if DDG API contracts were stopped, and is favored by people who value their privacy.

Apple is missing a search engine. That doesn't imply that Apple needs a search engine, nor does it imply that acquiring one would be the most profitable thing they could be doing with their available resources.

Arguably, a key part of Apple's success is that they don't behave like Microsoft.

Re: DuckDuckGo will use Apple Maps

#29

I could see a future where DDG gets acquired by Apple.

I'd rather see an investment. Maybe by providing a really good deal on maps[0]. Seems like this is a win-win for both. Apple wants to focus more on services and DDG gets a bit[1] of validation by being able to provide Apple maps.

[0] Obviously I have no idea if this is the case.

[1] As if they needed any.

Re: DuckDuckGo will use Apple Maps

#30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'd argue for it. Apple is missing a search engine, has deep-enough pockets and resources to build its own engine if DDG API contracts were stopped, and is favored by people who value their privacy.

Apple is missing a search engine. That doesn't imply that Apple needs a search engine, nor does it imply that acquiring one would be the most profitable thing they could be doing with their available resources. Arguably, a key part of Apple's success is that they don't behave like Microsoft.

Would DDG improve apples AI work? Google seems to be ahead of Apple with smart assistants, maybe that only a result of bad privacy policies on Googles part.
Post reply on HN