Live data from Hacker News

How a shampoo bottle is saving young lives

economist.com

21–30 of 81 posts

Re: How a shampoo bottle is saving young lives

#21
post #20

What a nice story about keeping things simple. Also, damn, neonatology must be brutal to work in at times.

I could never work in a vet office, obstetrics, neonates, or early paediatrics. I don't know how people do it.

Like everything else, it’s a job that you must emotionally separate yourself from to do it good.

Re: How a shampoo bottle is saving young lives

#23
post #20

What a nice story about keeping things simple. Also, damn, neonatology must be brutal to work in at times.

I could never work in a vet office, obstetrics, neonates, or early paediatrics. I don't know how people do it.

Management of and varying response to compassion fatigue.

There's a happy period where you're doing extremely fulfilling work, then a difficult time when you're distraught at your failures, then a complete indifference to suffering that you've normalized.

Managing fatigue and stress in any job is extremely important, managing compassion fatigue is even more so.

Re: How a shampoo bottle is saving young lives

#25

>>The hospital now deploys it routinely and the number of children who die there from pneumonia has fallen by three-quarters. That means the survival rate in the Dhaka Hospital is today almost on a par with that of children treated in rich-world facilities, using conventional ventilators. Innovation like this is facilitated by the lack of medical device regulations in Bangladesh.

Actually a doctor could probably do this in the us too. Weird stuff gets rigged up all the time, it’s just not as common as elsewhere because bugbhospitals have a ton of random stuff in inventory and cost is not constrained.

Also physicians can file INDs with much less paperwork than a company could. But it’s nonzero, so doesn’t happen all that often.

Re: How a shampoo bottle is saving young lives

#26

What a nice story about keeping things simple. Also, damn, neonatology must be brutal to work in at times.

Yes, I cannot imagine how people work in some of these fields. A lot of the pediatric specialization comes to mind also like oncology, cardiology. That some people can and do take the burden is the reason lots of those kids get to live.

Re: How a shampoo bottle is saving young lives

#27
post #20

What a nice story about keeping things simple. Also, damn, neonatology must be brutal to work in at times.

I could never work in a vet office, obstetrics, neonates, or early paediatrics. I don't know how people do it.

I once asked the nurses in the intensive care ward, where my baby son was, why they didn't work with adults rather than children. Surely the heartbreak was hard to cope with? They said it was because children didn't know they were supposed to be ill so they didn't lie around moaning like adults did—as soon as they felt a little better they would jump up and go and play with their toys. It was much more satisfying having patients who (if they got better) you saw go from coma to running around again full of joy.

Re: How a shampoo bottle is saving young lives

#28
post #8

> Ever heard of the concept of "jugaad"? It's a Hindi term meaning cheap innovation. Let's use this word in English as well, as it allows to direct our attention to jugaad immediately.

Eh, I tend to translate jugaad to hack.

I find that "hack" is simply a sort of close approximation to "jugaad", though this may just be entirely through the cultural context where it's used.

Re: How a shampoo bottle is saving young lives

#30

>>The hospital now deploys it routinely and the number of children who die there from pneumonia has fallen by three-quarters. That means the survival rate in the Dhaka Hospital is today almost on a par with that of children treated in rich-world facilities, using conventional ventilators. Innovation like this is facilitated by the lack of medical device regulations in Bangladesh.

I don’t think you deserve to be downvoted for this. A $5 hack is not really possible in the west, and that is definitely a thing worth thinking about. You might not get stopped from doing it if it was immediately obvious that it was effective but eventually hundreds of thousands if not millions would be spent on studies or approvals before a “proper” device made its way into the supply chain at 10000x markup over inj…

The challenge is that without regulation you get $5 life-saving shampoo hacks, but you also get lots of shake oil that is useless or harmful.
Post reply on HN