Well now we know what radio waves are produced by 0x55. How about other characters? I'm willing to bet that everyone's wired keyboard is an SDR so to speak and a well placed receiver can keylog you.
Serial Port SDR
21–30 of 91 posts
Re: Serial Port SDR
#22> This alone is impressive, but [Ted] isn’t done yet. He realized that this method of transmission was generating some strong frequency harmonics which extended far beyond the theoretical maximum 1 MHz frequency of his UART SDR. i.e., blast noise all over the spectrum. There's a reason why real transmitters are more expensive than a serial port adapter. This kind of RF pollution is illegal for obvious reasons and if…
But he doesn't have any amplification. Nothing is happening here that doesn't happen already with normal use of the UART. If what he is doing here is illegal then the RF pollution from using the UART normally would be too.
Re: Serial Port SDR
#23> This alone is impressive, but [Ted] isn’t done yet. He realized that this method of transmission was generating some strong frequency harmonics which extended far beyond the theoretical maximum 1 MHz frequency of his UART SDR. i.e., blast noise all over the spectrum. There's a reason why real transmitters are more expensive than a serial port adapter. This kind of RF pollution is illegal for obvious reasons and if…
But he doesn't have any amplification. Nothing is happening here that doesn't happen already with normal use of the UART. If what he is doing here is illegal then the RF pollution from using the UART normally would be too.
Re: Serial Port SDR
#24> This alone is impressive, but [Ted] isn’t done yet. He realized that this method of transmission was generating some strong frequency harmonics which extended far beyond the theoretical maximum 1 MHz frequency of his UART SDR. i.e., blast noise all over the spectrum. There's a reason why real transmitters are more expensive than a serial port adapter. This kind of RF pollution is illegal for obvious reasons and if…
From the article, the effective range seems to be around 10 feet. IIRC you are generally permitted to use whatever frequency you wish within a very limited radius as long as it is for "research purposes" Edit: this last point is wrong, as mentioned below exemptions seem to apply for certain frequencies with a low powered device https://www.fcc.gov/media/radio/low-power-radio-general-info...
Re: Serial Port SDR
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
But he doesn't have any amplification. Nothing is happening here that doesn't happen already with normal use of the UART. If what he is doing here is illegal then the RF pollution from using the UART normally would be too.
He connected an antenna to it. That's what makes it illegal.
Re: Serial Port SDR
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
From the article, the effective range seems to be around 10 feet. IIRC you are generally permitted to use whatever frequency you wish within a very limited radius as long as it is for "research purposes" Edit: this last point is wrong, as mentioned below exemptions seem to apply for certain frequencies with a low powered device https://www.fcc.gov/media/radio/low-power-radio-general-info...
Can you quote the FCC regulations that make this transmitter legal? (I'm assuming American law, the law in other countries obviously vary)
Re: Serial Port SDR
#27It sounds interesting. Beyond controlling RC vehicles, what would be some applications of software defined radios (SDRs)? By the way, it looks like a USB-VGA dongle can be manipulated in a similar way: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16907260
Re: Serial Port SDR
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
But he doesn't have any amplification. Nothing is happening here that doesn't happen already with normal use of the UART. If what he is doing here is illegal then the RF pollution from using the UART normally would be too.
He connected an antenna to it. That's what makes it illegal.
Has a Part 15 assessment been done yet? Have we analyzed power emission levels to assert that this thing is indeed 'breaking the law'?
Has this device been checked by the FCC for spurious emissions during normal operation? Did it pass, or is it chinese jank uncertifiable garbage?
Edit: C'mon downvoters. If you make a claim that it's "Illegal", you need to have some sort of proof that its the case. And I'm not immediately seeing it. Further research? Sure.
Re: Serial Port SDR
#29> This alone is impressive, but [Ted] isn’t done yet. He realized that this method of transmission was generating some strong frequency harmonics which extended far beyond the theoretical maximum 1 MHz frequency of his UART SDR. i.e., blast noise all over the spectrum. There's a reason why real transmitters are more expensive than a serial port adapter. This kind of RF pollution is illegal for obvious reasons and if…
There is a project that uses a Raspberry pi to transmit from is GPIO
To use a home built transmitter you need amateur radio license, no matter what.
Re: Serial Port SDR
#30It sounds interesting. Beyond controlling RC vehicles, what would be some applications of software defined radios (SDRs)? By the way, it looks like a USB-VGA dongle can be manipulated in a similar way: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16907260
And as for SDR applications: most of modern radio devices use software defined radios and many modern radio interfaces cannot be reasonably implemented in any other way.