Kessler syndrome is why it was so irresponsible of the Chinese to blow up a satellite just to prove that they could. * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_Chinese_anti-satellite_mi...
Kessler Syndrome
21–30 of 65 posts
Re: Kessler Syndrome
#22There's no incentive to me to make my satellite safely de-orbit before it gets broken into pieces. So why would I bother? That's expensive. But like all 'easy to litter, hard to clean up' problems of this nature, we have a solution already: require a cleanup deposit ahead of time that will be returned to whoever cleans it up. All space-launching countries should sign an accord that said something along the lines of "…
It won't cost the same to fetch something in low earth orbit than in geosynchronous orbit.
Re: Kessler Syndrome
#23I read about this first when I saw the movie "Gravity". I think if it really becomes that bad, given enough resources mankind can solve it.
Re: Kessler Syndrome
#24There's no incentive to me to make my satellite safely de-orbit before it gets broken into pieces. So why would I bother? That's expensive. But like all 'easy to litter, hard to clean up' problems of this nature, we have a solution already: require a cleanup deposit ahead of time that will be returned to whoever cleans it up. All space-launching countries should sign an accord that said something along the lines of "…
The price might need to be flat for each satellite (depending on the orbit) + a price per kg as cubesats are becoming more and more prevalent. It won't cost the same to fetch something in low earth orbit than in geosynchronous orbit.
Re: Kessler Syndrome
#25Re: Kessler Syndrome
#26So it’s kind of like we’re getting the effects of Kessler syndrome by trying to prevent it.
Re: Kessler Syndrome
#27Food for thought.
Re: Kessler Syndrome
#28The higher you go, the more absolute volume there is, the slower the satellites there travel and the fewer satellites there are.
So that leaves a band of mid-upper LEO satellites to consider for Kessler Syndrome.
When you have a collision between satellites, the velocity on average of each fragment is less than it was before, making the fragments decay faster. The fragments after each collision are smaller than they were before as well, thus having more air and solar resistance, which also makes them decay faster.
The Chinese FY-1C satellite that was blown up was the absolute worst case for a satellite explosion. It was located on the high side of LEO with a decay time measured in human generations, and it was in a super crowded sun-following orbit altitude, sharing space with lots of weather and earth observation satellites. The explosion generated 150,000 debris fragments.
In the ten years since, most of those fragments have reentered. We now have 2,000 golfball sized or bigger fragments being tracked, and over the past ten years, the only casualty has been a small, ten pound reflector satellite. Small debris pieces fall, and big pieces can be tracked and avoided.
If every satellite we have put into space magically exploded, and the debris was magically moved to a high LEO altitude and evenly distributed to avoid any holes, then we could still launch through this orbit of death to higher altitudes with only a 1 in 1000 probability of impact.
Space regulation has gotten much tougher since the bad old days. Satellites are now required to have deorbit or safeing plans, and the median satellites size has gone down by a couple orders of magnitude.
Kessler syndrome isn't something that keeps me up at night.
Re: Kessler Syndrome
#29Kessler syndrome is why it was so irresponsible of the Chinese to blow up a satellite just to prove that they could. * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_Chinese_anti-satellite_mi...
And irresponsible of the USA to send needles to space https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_West_Ford
Re: Kessler Syndrome
#30Kessler syndrome is why it was so irresponsible of the Chinese to blow up a satellite just to prove that they could. * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_Chinese_anti-satellite_mi...