Live data from Hacker News

Brave Browser is taking the web by storm

hackernoon.com

21–29 of 29 posts

Re: Brave Browser is taking the web by storm

#23

This article is plagiarized on my Hackernoon article : https://hackernoon.com/brave-browser-is-taking-the-web-by-st...

The account which posted this link to HN seems to have a posting history that includes at least one other Medium article by a one-time 'author' plagiarized from Hackernoon.

Re: Brave Browser is taking the web by storm

#25

I like the concept of Brave browser, but the severe lack of extensions make it a nonstarter. Loading Chrome extensions into Brave looks complex to the extent where I'd rather just load up Chrome or Firefox.

Brave is now based on Chromium. You can install extensions from the Chrome web store just as you would in Chrome.

To me, Brave is just Chrome without all the Google stuff and a built-in ad-blocker. It's fantastic.

Re: Brave Browser is taking the web by storm

#26
post #22

This article is plagiarized on my Hackernoon article : https://hackernoon.com/brave-browser-is-taking-the-web-by-st...

Eeek! We've updated the link from https://medium.com/@sburner1000/brave-browser-is-taking-the-... .

Please take a look at o_wilson's posting history, as I have found another link to a plagiarized article on Medium, and the situation doesn't pass the smell test.

Re: Brave Browser is taking the web by storm

#27
post #22

This article is plagiarized on my Hackernoon article : https://hackernoon.com/brave-browser-is-taking-the-web-by-st...

Eeek! We've updated the link from https://medium.com/@sburner1000/brave-browser-is-taking-the-... .

Shouldn't you avoid adding that link to Medium to not give them free ranking?

Re: Brave Browser is taking the web by storm

#28
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In what way is that different than the current state of affairs?

Not at all. This is portrayed as a way of fixing the incentive structure of the web by making people pay for content, but it only fixes part of the problem. Time tracking is not the same as users making an active choice about what contributes value to their lives (e.g., choosing to pay for a subscription). I would hate to see this compensation mechanism become widespread.

I'm not a fan of time tracking, but I like current subscription models like Patreon or Youtube's even less.

There's about 30 content creators I'd like to support, but in no way I'd pay $5 each, which is the standard contribution proposed by e.g. Youtube. In fact, I'm not supporting anybody at the moment, except seldomly donating money with Paypal.

I budget my salary every month, and I'd like to give, say $50 a month to the creators I follow. Perhaps in different percentages. Next month I'm more generous, here's $200, please divide it accordingly.

It's easy for us with a decent salary, but many, if not most people I know have $10 to spare. It's about 2 Youtube subscriptions. What to support more people? Get a better job or turn off your ad blocker and give your data and privacy away.

Time tracking might not be optimal, but the killer feature to me is "this is what I have, split it and donate it, even if it's just a few pennies."

Post reply on HN