Live data from Hacker News

YouTube CEO says EU regulation will be bad for creators

theverge.com

21–30 of 121 posts

Re: YouTube CEO says EU regulation will be bad for creators

#21
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Big companies can just make deals and use whatever they want. Independent content creators don't have the resources to go to EMI and cut a deal for using their music as soundtrack for their videos. In addition, for a big company being sued is part of business, while for a regular guy it can mean bankruptcy. Taking the risk of using other people's stuff--even if it should obviously be considered fair use--might be too…

Maybe the royalty free music will get a well deserved upswing? It can be very cheap to buy non-exclusive music to put on your videos if that is what you need. And less exposure for the EMI-branded music in the process. Win win.

Sure, maybe! YouTube also offers royalty-free music, but it doesn't always go well. I made a few videos in the past, and bought music from iStockPhoto.

The problem of being sued to shut down negative reviews remains, though.

Re: YouTube CEO says EU regulation will be bad for creators

#23

This is even better: > The burden of copyright proof will be too high for most independent creators to instantly demonstrate. If I record a video, and YT bans it because their faulty algorithm triggered a false alarm, how exactly the "burden of copyright proof" should be "too high" for me? First of all, they should prove that someone else owns the copyright. If they're mistaken - because of copyright trolls or faulty…

[deleted]

Re: YouTube CEO says EU regulation will be bad for creators

#25

> The proposal will force platforms, like YouTube, to prioritize content from a small number of large companies. That's orthogonal to what the Article 13 really says. If anything, it will "force" the platforms to prioritize original content over remakes.

> That's orthogonal to what the Article 13 really says.

It's not orthogonal at all. What the CEO said lines up precisely with what Article 13 says.

> If anything, it will "force" the platforms to prioritize original content over remakes.

Your wording is very peculiar. "remakes" can be original content. Like the remake of "A Star is Born" is original content. Youtube's issue isn't about "remakes". It's about critism and fair use.

The only thing EU regulation is meant to due is to stifle discussion, criticism, artist creation, etc in favor of multinational corporations and of course the political elite.

It's not about "original content", but the ability of the media conglomerates to suppress smaller creators and take their money. It's about using law, money and regulation to bully and intimidate and silence.

Youtube already does this to a limited degree as media companies have subsidiaries that pretty much mark everything as a copyright violation and force independent creators to prove their innocence. When in a fair society, things should be reversed. Innocence should be assumed and the guilt has to be proven.

Re: YouTube CEO says EU regulation will be bad for creators

#26

This is even better: > The burden of copyright proof will be too high for most independent creators to instantly demonstrate. If I record a video, and YT bans it because their faulty algorithm triggered a false alarm, how exactly the "burden of copyright proof" should be "too high" for me? First of all, they should prove that someone else owns the copyright. If they're mistaken - because of copyright trolls or faulty…

The EU directive incentivises web platforms to take an extremely copyright-holder-friendly position, since there are massive penalties for allowing content that is found to be infringing, but no penalties for refusing to host content that is not infringing.

People (and companies they work for) respond to incentives.

Re: YouTube CEO says EU regulation will be bad for creators

#27
So Youtube does have a CEO, after all! /s

It irritates me that no article I have ever read discussing Youtube's failings mentions anything about the people in charge. There have been several articles over the past couple years pointing out Youtube's ill effects on the world. In each case, the author makes it seem that Youtube is just a force of nature, with nobody at the wheel.

Meanwhile, the past week I've read two article that reference Susan Wojcicki, and neither are critical.

At least when Zuckerberg encounters the public, there's a chance someone might give him a piece of their mind over Facebook's failings. I doubt Wojcicki ever hears feedback from the public... nobody knows who she is.

Re: YouTube CEO says EU regulation will be bad for creators

#28

"YouTube has already invested more than $60 million into its Content ID system" That actually seems low to me, given we're talking about numbers (revenue, users) in the billions.

I think the fact that so little has human oversight and no direct way of disputing with a human is probably how they can handle it.

Re: YouTube CEO says EU regulation will be bad for creators

#29
This is rich. Every YouTube creator that I follow has at least one video whose purpose is to rail against YouTube's mystifying demonetization policies, their trigger-happy DMCA policies that aggressively favor major copyright holders, and their opaque and useless litigation process. Here's one for reference: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bGZ_a6gL0f4 . Listening to the CEO of YouTube cry "but think of the content creators!" is about as transparently self-serving as a US politician crying "but think of the children!"
Post reply on HN