Live data from Hacker News

Calculus Made Easy (1910)

calculusmadeeasy.org

21–30 of 76 posts

Re: Calculus Made Easy (1910)

#21

The beginning calculus book for me is Gilbert Strang's Calculus. https://ocw.mit.edu/ans7870/resources/Strang/Edited/Calculus... Calculus Made Easy seems too dumbed down to me.

Are you just basing that on the title, or have you actually spent some time with it?

Re: Calculus Made Easy (1910)

#22

The beginning calculus book for me is Gilbert Strang's Calculus. https://ocw.mit.edu/ans7870/resources/Strang/Edited/Calculus... Calculus Made Easy seems too dumbed down to me.

Do us a favor and delete your comment. This kind of talk can discourage and embarrass people who would otherwise be focused on learning.

Just link to the book, which is good, and save us your little puffing yourself up bit. I am sorry but I cannot sit by and watch someone belittle people who would want to learn.

edit: sorry, I am a bit high strung today. Defending tomorrow afternoon. Whatever though. the above is still true. We have an epidemic of "make those who would try hard feel stupid" and it needs to end.

Re: Calculus Made Easy (1910)

#24
From the book:

>I To deliver you from the Preliminary Terrors

>The preliminary terror [..] can be abolished once for all by simply stating what is the meaning–in common-sense terms–of the two principal symbols:

(1) d, which merely means “a little bit of.” Thus dx means a little bit of x; or du means a little bit of u.

(2) ∫, which is merely a long S, and may be called (if you like) “the sum of.”

As someone who taught Calculus, how I wish every book on the subject started like that!

If I ever have to do it again, I will use this book. Wish I had known about it earlier.

The book includes a very important chapter on compound interest, which is too often glossed over in texts used today. I wrote notes to remedy that (as an extra-credit reading project for the students), and was glad to find that the book has a similar approach:

http://romankogan.net/math/A_paper_of_interest/A_Paper_of_In...

Re: Calculus Made Easy (1910)

#25

The beginning calculus book for me is Gilbert Strang's Calculus. https://ocw.mit.edu/ans7870/resources/Strang/Edited/Calculus... Calculus Made Easy seems too dumbed down to me.

It's not a matter of dumbing down. One is classic university-level treatment, the other tries to get you up-and-running as quickly as possible.

Re: Calculus Made Easy (1910)

#26

Although the calculus concepts from 1910 may still be relevant, quotes like these make the book outputting -- "The preliminary terror, which chokes off most fifth-form boys from even attempting to learn how to calculate..." Ugh!

What's wrong with that?

"boys"

Re: Calculus Made Easy (1910)

#28
Although my high school calculus classes didn't use this particular textbook, they introduced concepts in a very similar order and manner. I always wished college calculus had been so well explained.

Re: Calculus Made Easy (1910)

#30
post #24

From the book: >I To deliver you from the Preliminary Terrors >The preliminary terror [..] can be abolished once for all by simply stating what is the meaning–in common-sense terms–of the two principal symbols: (1) d, which merely means “a little bit of.” Thus dx means a little bit of x; or du means a little bit of u. (2) ∫, which is merely a long S, and may be called (if you like) “the sum of.” As someone who taught…

Indeed. They never explained this at school and we were just memorizing and applying formulae having no idea of the meaning. So many years have passed an I've only realized what does the d actually mean some weeks ago and now I see this book explaining it this easy at the very beginning written in 1910!
Post reply on HN