I think various flavors of Markdown have largely superseded TeX, at least for stylistic minimalists. I'm not saying that TeX is obsolete, but for the majority of use cases, Markdown is faster and less troublesome. Modernity always triumphs.
TinyTeX: A lightweight and easy-to-maintain LaTeX distribution
21–30 of 58 posts
Re: TinyTeX: A lightweight and easy-to-maintain LaTeX distribution
#22My favorite part about this article is the extra wide space that follows their apostrophe character. It really gives an air of legitimacy to their LaTeX distribution...
Re: TinyTeX: A lightweight and easy-to-maintain LaTeX distribution
#23My favorite part about this article is the extra wide space that follows their apostrophe character. It really gives an air of legitimacy to their LaTeX distribution...
Re: TinyTeX: A lightweight and easy-to-maintain LaTeX distribution
#24I looked at LaTeX, got the basic books, etc. and concluded that (A) Knuth's documentation in The TeXBook is relatively short, well written, and essentially totally free of bugs, and it is easy to write more macros and (B) the LaTeX documentation is much longer, less well written, for the internal logic much harder to understand, maybe with bugs if only from the length and complexity and being so big and complicated, and much more difficult for me to write more macros. So, I've just stayed with TeX and never used LaTeX except once when I downloaded a paper in LaTeX and wanted to format and read it.
Lesson: TeX itself, the design, documentation, functionality, and code are really quite good, and for some people LaTeX may be less good. Don't rush to give up on TeX.
Re: TinyTeX: A lightweight and easy-to-maintain LaTeX distribution
#25Re: TinyTeX: A lightweight and easy-to-maintain LaTeX distribution
#26To be honest, when I am using LaTeX, I just want to write without any interruption. That's why I install texlive-full. Since I am (almost) guaranteed that whatever I encountered, I would be able to do it. Dealing with complexity of LaTeX and CPAN is not something I really want to do, especially when I am meeting (paper submission) deadline.
However, I can see this being a real benefit to Windows and OSX users, who don't have a native package manager. If you're going to be in the unfortunate position of managing LaTeX packages manually, it would be great to have a low-friction way to do that and a minimal portable distribution to start with.
My one actual criticism is the name: it should be TinyLaTeX. TeX and LaTeX are two different things.
Re: TinyTeX: A lightweight and easy-to-maintain LaTeX distribution
#27> If you create a tarball of TinyTeX on macOS or Ubuntu, it will be only 50MB This is excellent and has accelerated my long-term dream: an up-to-date TeX distribution that can live in my home directory in an lz4 (hc) squashfs archive (72M) and be mounted on an as-needed basis. UPDATE: As I had hoped, TinyTeX works in an lz4 squashfs. On my system it's actually a tiny bit faster under squashfs than from my ext4 home p…
Re: TinyTeX: A lightweight and easy-to-maintain LaTeX distribution
#28Re: TinyTeX: A lightweight and easy-to-maintain LaTeX distribution
#29I grew irritated with texlive and instead just opted to use https://overleaf.com for my LaTeX documents
Re: TinyTeX: A lightweight and easy-to-maintain LaTeX distribution
#30The other day I saw a resume written in LaTeX. Sorry, that's the height of pretension.