E-Ink Monitors: Ready for Prime Time?
21–30 of 95 posts
Re: E-Ink Monitors: Ready for Prime Time?
#22It's always going to be dodgy until the graphical OS you're running is aware of what eInk is, and adapts the UI toolkit and general rendering to play to eInk's strengths.
This might be one of those situations where things have to move forward imperfectly. First some people get eInk monitors, then OS developers see that there are at least some real users and some concrete reason to believe there's a payoff in supporting them. Then decent software support will encourage more people to get eInk monitors, and that will encourage OS developers to turn decent software support into good soft…
I don't suffer from any medical reason to use one, but, I would absolutely purchase one this second (any pay a lot for it) if it worked well. Unfortunately, what I've seen so far from the Dasung and the Onyx, isn't worth $800. I just hope these companies have enough runway to continue improving the product such that early adopters like myself, will jump in.
Re: E-Ink Monitors: Ready for Prime Time?
#23I wish Sharp Memory LCDs[1] were made in 20"+ format. They're a hybrid between LCDs and E-paper displays with extremely fast refresh rates and the contrast is almost as good as ePaper displays. I think monochrome displays would be fantastic for distraction-free coding or reading. What's interesting is that you just need to toggle VCOM signal either through software or external source every 1-2 seconds for about 10ms.…
Re: E-Ink Monitors: Ready for Prime Time?
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
You get a LOT more light from a backlight than from reflection, at least in indoor conditions.
I can turn my monitor down so it's dimmer than a sheet of white paper on my desk. If I aim a desk lamp directly at the paper I can make it brighter than the monitor on full brightness. There's no standard brightness for monitor or paper.
Re: E-Ink Monitors: Ready for Prime Time?
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
I can turn my monitor down so it's dimmer than a sheet of white paper on my desk. If I aim a desk lamp directly at the paper I can make it brighter than the monitor on full brightness. There's no standard brightness for monitor or paper.
But can you actually READ your monitor when it’s dimmer than a sheet of paper in ambient light?
Re: E-Ink Monitors: Ready for Prime Time?
#26Re: E-Ink Monitors: Ready for Prime Time?
#27Re: E-Ink Monitors: Ready for Prime Time?
#28Re: E-Ink Monitors: Ready for Prime Time?
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17724995 Was a good thread
I don't see anything related to reflectivity vs. backlight illumination. Most of the discussion is around the wavelength of light (blue) and its effects.
Re: E-Ink Monitors: Ready for Prime Time?
#30> It turns out that staring at back-lit computer monitors for 40+ hours a week might not be the best thing for you. Source? Light is still hitting your retinas, whether it comes from reflection or from a backlight. I really enjoy E-Ink displays, but not because of perceived health benefits from reflected light. I enjoy how readable they are under sunlight, how they consume zero energy to show a static image, and how…
You get a LOT more light from a backlight than from reflection, at least in indoor conditions.
If a monitor has bad contrast and you turn up the brightness, that's not the fault of the light source. That monitor still won't even come close to the amount of blue light that a blue sky emits, even at maximum brightness.
Personally, I think all monitors made in the last 10 years should be as legible at low brightness as a piece of paper is in an equally poorly lit room.