Live data from Hacker News

Sherlock Holmes May Not Have Been a Real Crime-Fighter, but His Creator Was

washingtonpost.com

21–24 of 24 posts

Re: Sherlock Holmes May Not Have Been a Real Crime-Fighter, but His Creator Was

#21

There's a lot about Doyle that was atypical. Brilliant mind. But he believed in some pretty supernatural stuff as well. Faeries and the like. Imagine what you believe in now that will seem fanciful in a century.

I'm under the impression that brilliant minds tend to come with eccentricity attached. Part of being brilliant (or at least intelligent) is the awareness that much of what we take as fact isn't. For example, it used to be a "fact" that an imbalance of humors caused all diseases. The corollary is that when you believe something people think is silly, like that faeries exist, they may be wrong. This is particularly tri…

It's honestly easier to just create a bucket labeled 'beliefs' and make your own mental model of keeping track of which things are beliefs and which things are actual fact. You can still pull things out of the bucket and put things into it. It's just easier to manage that way, because you might have to deal with some statements that go from being empirically disproven to proven to disproven to proven and so on and so forth for a long time. Just a consequence of too much information and a brain that can't handle all of it independently.

Being able to trust others in their understanding is helpful but it's probably not going to help you sleep at night trying to figure out what you know and what you don't.

Re: Sherlock Holmes May Not Have Been a Real Crime-Fighter, but His Creator Was

#22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I thought Doyle was fairly quickly ruled out. Charles Dawson seems most likely, has been connected with other frauds and half his collection was fake.

Right you are. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2016/08/10/sir-arthur-co... I remember reading this in the 90s in SciAm which was supposedly linked to his deep resentment of scientific community in general.

Memory is a funny thing - that's much more recent than I thought!

Re: Sherlock Holmes May Not Have Been a Real Crime-Fighter, but His Creator Was

#23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm under the impression that brilliant minds tend to come with eccentricity attached. Part of being brilliant (or at least intelligent) is the awareness that much of what we take as fact isn't. For example, it used to be a "fact" that an imbalance of humors caused all diseases. The corollary is that when you believe something people think is silly, like that faeries exist, they may be wrong. This is particularly tri…

It's honestly easier to just create a bucket labeled 'beliefs' and make your own mental model of keeping track of which things are beliefs and which things are actual fact. You can still pull things out of the bucket and put things into it. It's just easier to manage that way, because you might have to deal with some statements that go from being empirically disproven to proven to disproven to proven and so on and so…

[deleted]

Re: Sherlock Holmes May Not Have Been a Real Crime-Fighter, but His Creator Was

#24

There's a lot about Doyle that was atypical. Brilliant mind. But he believed in some pretty supernatural stuff as well. Faeries and the like. Imagine what you believe in now that will seem fanciful in a century.

I wonder if such open mindedness, allows you to explore edge cases of your field more easily. If you do not discard outliers as data-noise, but fairys pulling on the fabrique of reality- maybe you investigate something, others by the virtue of there filters are blind for.

Sure, your lack of comon sense, will not allow you tomake heads and tails from it, but otherwise..

Post reply on HN