Live data from Hacker News

AT&T promised lower prices after Time Warner merger, but it’s raising them

arstechnica.com

21–30 of 42 posts

Re: AT&T promised lower prices after Time Warner merger, but it’s raising them

#21

Seriously? AT&T just spent $85bln and someone believes the prices will be lower?!

AT&T bought assets with that money. They're receiving income that in theory should be offsetting what they spent. It's not like they bought a car and a nice dinner. The money isn't gone.

Re: AT&T promised lower prices after Time Warner merger, but it’s raising them

#23

Seriously? AT&T just spent $85bln and someone believes the prices will be lower?!

AT&T bought assets with that money. They're receiving income that in theory should be offsetting what they spent. It's not like they bought a car and a nice dinner. The money isn't gone.

The money isn't gone but cash-flow is.

With this step they will have better cash-flow earlier.

Re: AT&T promised lower prices after Time Warner merger, but it’s raising them

#24

Merging feels like a form of collusion. I have a service. You have a service. Let's combine them to eliminate competition between us and make both of us richer with higher prices.

It is also almost always bad for shareholders when companies are merged.

Let's say there are two competing companies, I could myself as an investor chose where to put my money, in one or the other or both. When they merge I lose the ability to place my money how I see fit.

As my professor/dean in financial economics said: If you get to vote on a merger, always vote no!

Re: AT&T promised lower prices after Time Warner merger, but it’s raising them

#26
The three largest OTT providers (Sling, YouTube TV and DirectTV Now) all raised their prices by $5 recently. This seems similar to how airlines all manage to raise their fares at the same time without explicit coordination (one airline does it, and the others quickly match). I don't think it has anything to do with the merger.

Re: AT&T promised lower prices after Time Warner merger, but it’s raising them

#27
post #24

Merging feels like a form of collusion. I have a service. You have a service. Let's combine them to eliminate competition between us and make both of us richer with higher prices.

It is also almost always bad for shareholders when companies are merged. Let's say there are two competing companies, I could myself as an investor chose where to put my money, in one or the other or both. When they merge I lose the ability to place my money how I see fit. As my professor/dean in financial economics said: If you get to vote on a merger, always vote no!

This seems to assume that the conjoined entity is exactly equivalent in terms of efficiency and market power to the previous two separate entities- That's a pretty radical assumption and it seems you'd have to give some evidence to explain why this would be the case.

Re: AT&T promised lower prices after Time Warner merger, but it’s raising them

#29
well AT&T is crappy, but this article is poorly sourced. The CEO has said exactly that before, but the court filing is about what the government could prove, not about what will happen.

https://www.cnet.com/news/at-t-ceo-makes-the-case-for-time-w...

Re: AT&T promised lower prices after Time Warner merger, but it’s raising them

#30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

AT&T bought assets with that money. They're receiving income that in theory should be offsetting what they spent. It's not like they bought a car and a nice dinner. The money isn't gone.

The money isn't gone but cash-flow is. With this step they will have better cash-flow earlier.

Yes, raising prices tends to do that. Doesn't mean they had to in order to finance the deal. They did it because they could.
Post reply on HN