Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Fixing Weak Wi-Fi Router Security

nytimes.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

21–30 of 69 posts

Re: Fixing Weak Wi-Fi Router Security

#21

Post by sp332 »

deno wrote: post #19
ris wrote: post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And how much money are you bleeding running that machine 24/7?

For 100 MBit/s firewall all you need is Raspberry PI. Most people’s WAN connection is probably less than that. And if you need gigabit then there’s still plenty of options, anything from ODROID-C to 10W Goldmont, the latter a little expensive but it can double as HTPC etc. Idk how any of those work with BSDs but they work fine on Linux. Also the nic.cz people have a neat new product[1]. It’s really cool, but I think…

Last I checked pfsense wasn't running on ARM. And there were worries that it wouldn't even be able to keep up unless you were very careful with your filters, although that might be less of a problem with the more recent hardware.

Re: Fixing Weak Wi-Fi Router Security

#22

Post by stamps »

kop316 wrote: post #17
stamps wrote: post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not OP but I run a PC Engines APU2[1] as my pfsense box. It's 6-10 watts. Updates are easy to manage, I use Pfblocker which is similar functionality to PiHole, and have cloudflares DNS (1.1.1.1) set up. As for wireless I attach a Ubiquiti AP through a switch. I've done this at a couple different sites for relatives and it's comforting to know there's some semblence of security and privacy for them. [1] http://www.pce…

I have one of those as well. As a word of caution, they are dropping support for that in 2.5 [1]. Starting in 2.5, they are requiring AES-NI instructions (like I said in my other post, I am a bit irritated they did that, especially when that is a requirement for something I do not need). [1] https://www.netgate.com/blog/pfsense-2-5-and-aes-ni.html

The APU2 does have AES-NI so no need to worry.

Mine is active and working (I use it with OpenVPN right now).

Re: Fixing Weak Wi-Fi Router Security

#23

Post by stamps »

kop316 wrote: post #16
2-4-Flinching wrote: post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That is the reason I run a pfsense router/firewall. You never worry they are going to stop supporting your device cause your device is x86 with FreeBSD base.

Actually, that is not strictly so [1]. Starting in 2.5, they are requiring AES-NI instructions. I am a bit irritated with that as I bought one of their "official" routers to support them (The one based on the PC Engine APU2) and I use it as a home router, so I really don't need that support. [1] https://www.netgate.com/blog/pfsense-2-5-and-aes-ni.html

Said it below, but the APU2 does support AES-NI.

I wanted to make sure you saw this.

Re: Fixing Weak Wi-Fi Router Security

#24

Post by deno »

sp332 wrote: post #21
deno wrote: post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For 100 MBit/s firewall all you need is Raspberry PI. Most people’s WAN connection is probably less than that. And if you need gigabit then there’s still plenty of options, anything from ODROID-C to 10W Goldmont, the latter a little expensive but it can double as HTPC etc. Idk how any of those work with BSDs but they work fine on Linux. Also the nic.cz people have a neat new product[1]. It’s really cool, but I think…

Last I checked pfsense wasn't running on ARM. And there were worries that it wouldn't even be able to keep up unless you were very careful with your filters, although that might be less of a problem with the more recent hardware.

I suppose at gigabit the pi might have some issues. Unfortunately, I don’t have this problem. I doubt Goldmont would break any sweat though. If you don’t want to jump all the way to Intel there’s always this: http://espressobin.net/

Re: Fixing Weak Wi-Fi Router Security

#26

Post by inferiorhuman »

amiga-workbench wrote: post #12

Grab a decent microtik router and a few Ubiquiti Unifi AP's, setup automatic updates, and never touch them again.

While not necessarily exploitable Ubiquiti ships known vulnerable packages. Let's not forget their u-boot fiasco and GPL violations.

Re: Fixing Weak Wi-Fi Router Security

#27

Post by rogerbinns »

rhinoceraptor wrote: post #11
_emacsomancer_ wrote: post #2

> Replace your router every few years How about instead of this, use open source software on your router? It will keep being updated, and with the manufacturer's proprietary software on the device you can't really trust it anyway.

That's a good solution for geeks, not so much for everyone else. Regular people don't even update their routers, much less flash 3rd party software on them. I don't think most people even know updating your router is even a possibility. I use Google Wifi and it updates itself. In the future I might put in a PFSense, but wifi solutions like Google Wifi/Eero/etc are the way to go if you're not a computer person.

> Regular people don't even update their routers

I work on a product that gets connected to people's home wifi. In the last year we've had several with routers running WEP security.

WEP was superseded in 2003 by WPA, and deprecated in 2004!

Re: Fixing Weak Wi-Fi Router Security

#29

Post by _emacsomancer_ »

sp332 wrote: post #4
_emacsomancer_ wrote: post #2

> Replace your router every few years How about instead of this, use open source software on your router? It will keep being updated, and with the manufacturer's proprietary software on the device you can't really trust it anyway.

Your odds might be better, but there's no guarantee that the software will keep being updated. DD-WRT for many models is simply defunct, for example.

Sure. Be at least you're likely to get rather longer support than from the manufacturer. (And, length of support aside, not having concealed code running on the thing that handles both my internal and external networking is somewhat valuable to me.)

Re: Fixing Weak Wi-Fi Router Security

#30

Post by _emacsomancer_ »

rhinoceraptor wrote: post #11
_emacsomancer_ wrote: post #2

> Replace your router every few years How about instead of this, use open source software on your router? It will keep being updated, and with the manufacturer's proprietary software on the device you can't really trust it anyway.

That's a good solution for geeks, not so much for everyone else. Regular people don't even update their routers, much less flash 3rd party software on them. I don't think most people even know updating your router is even a possibility. I use Google Wifi and it updates itself. In the future I might put in a PFSense, but wifi solutions like Google Wifi/Eero/etc are the way to go if you're not a computer person.

This does sound like a good general model. Assuming it has a 2nd partition or whatever to guarantee you'll never end up with a non-working router.
Post reply on HN