Live data from Hacker News

Heat loss from big corporate projects

rachelbythebay.com

21–30 of 57 posts

Re: Heat loss from big corporate projects

#21
post #3

The whole system where all of these projects generally go towards some form of advertising where we convince people to buy things they don't really need is a far worse form of heat loss than this. Buying the latest shiny smartphone every year isn't just the heat loss of thousands of engineers making it slightly thinner, it's the actual loss of all the resources that went into last year's batch of smartphones that end…

[deleted]

Re: Heat loss from big corporate projects

#23
post #3

The whole system where all of these projects generally go towards some form of advertising where we convince people to buy things they don't really need is a far worse form of heat loss than this. Buying the latest shiny smartphone every year isn't just the heat loss of thousands of engineers making it slightly thinner, it's the actual loss of all the resources that went into last year's batch of smartphones that end…

> advertising where we convince people to buy things they don't really need is a far worse form of heat loss.

The core business of advertising is making people chronically dissatisfied with their life. Not only does it cause economic waste, but it brings people down. Ad blocking (online and IRL) is not only a matter of privacy, it is a matter of sanity.

On your original point, please sing along gaily...

    Grow theee...
    Grow theee...
    Grow the economy

    Exponentially
    we rise and we rise
    and we tear up the skies
    we...

    Grow theee...
    Grow theee...
    Grow the economy

    Like a kick-ass cancer
    Hyperinvasive
    And when everything's ruined
    What will we do?
    What will we do?
    Cancer thank you!

    Grow theee...
    Grow theee...
    Grow the economy

    Just like rabbits in Australia
    Grow the economy
    Wildfires in California
    Grow the economy
    Nagasaki, Hiroshima
    Grow the economy

    The earth is like an apple pie...
    Let's eat it and let's die!

    Do you want some more? It's delicious :-)

Re: Heat loss from big corporate projects

#24
post #3

The whole system where all of these projects generally go towards some form of advertising where we convince people to buy things they don't really need is a far worse form of heat loss than this. Buying the latest shiny smartphone every year isn't just the heat loss of thousands of engineers making it slightly thinner, it's the actual loss of all the resources that went into last year's batch of smartphones that end…

Your statement about new shiny smartphone being a heat loss implies that there's some objective measure of what's worthy of resources and what's not. I don't think so.

Life has no meaning, and there's no inherent value in anything. How people decide to spend resources that they have is their responsibility. Thankfully, money, together with open markets is an extremely effective mechanism of conciliating millions of such decisions. So, if millions of people decide that they would rather buy a new phone than, I don't know, help starving children in Africa – it's their responsibility. Blaming it on advertisement is a view that presents these millions of people as helpless children, who are so easy to manipulate that they can't even be responsible for their own decisions – which is very far from the truth.

Re: Heat loss from big corporate projects

#25
I think many businesses are implementing productivity improvement work which consists of a) an investment in engineering time and b) moving things around. I think to most people moving things around is the only really visible part. I think this leads to others simply copying the 'moving around' part in order to attempt to gain productivity improvements. The most common example of this nowadays is people moving their infrastructure into a cloud provider. If this is not done right and the investment made in the engineering time to deliver a more productive result, it's going to be worse than not moving around.

Re: Heat loss from big corporate projects

#27
Has anyone blogged about a software refactoring project being "heat loss"?

Same thing really -- it comes out better, the same or worse but the underlying principles are identical. You could avoid the "heat loss" by just hacking on the old crufty code or redesign it into a fancy-smancy state of the art system.

I would also bring up The Economic Calculation Problem and how it applies to large monolithic corporations equally as well but that's a discussion for another day.

Re: Heat loss from big corporate projects

#28
post #26

The example with the halved memory space isn't a good one. There might be a real net benefit to society by using up less resources.

There might also be a net loss to society for any number of reasons, Bastiat's That Which is Seen, and That Which is Not Seen is of special interest here.

Re: Heat loss from big corporate projects

#29
This is a lovely account and, though it may not seem when you first read it -- in my experience, it is somewhat optimistic. For instance:

> The process of changing the system to have a new balancing point took work. It involved investments of engineer time, design work, tech writers and documentation changes, and all kinds of other "meta" stuff.

In most places I've worked, this involves investments of two interns' time and a few design meetings which result in a design document, half of which will never make it into the actual implementation. If it's a customer-facing thing, it will result in documentation changes -- otherwise, it won't. There will be no time to adjust the documentation and internal knowledge about how we do it now is going to float around as oral wisdom. Why we do it like that is going to be folklore two years down the road.

Re: Heat loss from big corporate projects

#30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How can you have a market inside a company? Markets depend on having multiple suppliers and multiple customers. Nokia tried having internal competition and it didn't go well. Something like it can work though. Many years ago I worked for Philip Semiconductor at the Mullard factory in Southampton in a department that designed and built production and test equipment. We had a formal project process where if the custome…

Its not a market so much as an economy. Instead of necessarily saying "you must do things this way" its "you must meet these requirements and these SLAs/goals/dates, and you have this many Magic Corporate Resource Bucks to spend". Those Magic Corporate Resource Bucks aren't real dollars necessarily, but they are representative of the costs of things that other divisions of the company may provide. You can swap your M…

Do you know if any companies have actually tried this? I'd love to read a case study if you know of one.
Post reply on HN