Live data from Hacker News

Kind reminder: please (re)read the HN guidelines

ycombinator.com

21–30 of 141 posts

Re: Kind reminder: please (re)read the HN guidelines

#21
post #5
post #3

thanks hopefully this can stay near the top for a while. been getting a lot of off topic posts again recently; adverts, thinly veiled spam, repeat posts etc. one thing i do wish hn had is a link/title checker to stop people all linking to same story hours or days apart.

I'm pretty sure if you try to submit the same link multiple times HN will show you the originally submitted story.

Not only that, but if it does find a story to the same link, it will upvote it.

Re: Kind reminder: please (re)read the HN guidelines

#22
post #20

I don't see HN going downhill in terms of submissions or in discourse. Things are mostly the same as they were 2-3 years ago. I do worry -- perhaps unnecessarily -- about the killing of submissions for no obvious reason. Apparently using a URL shortener is verboten, although the HN guidelines don't mention this. But using one will get your story autokilled. Yesterday, I tried to submit what I thought was an interesti…

What do you need the URL shortener for? I find it very annoying to have to click in order to see who the author of the content is when I can just look at the domain name at the end of the HN submission.

Re: Kind reminder: please (re)read the HN guidelines

#23
post #10

I'm pleased to see that I am officially allowed to complain that HNN is getting to be just like Reddit.

I still have about 3 weeks left before I can make that complaint. Luckily though, HN seems to be holding steady, and it has a long way to go before it becomes Reddit. HN is like having a conversation in your living room at a cocktail party with a lot of smart people in attendance. Reddit is like having a conversation at a sports bar with a bunch of random drunk assholes.

I think if we can get it to the point where it's like going out for beers with a bunch of smart people at a reasonably nice bar that will be perfect.

Re: Kind reminder: please (re)read the HN guidelines

#24
post #7

Yes, yes, HN is going to the dogs, it's not as good as it used to be, it's all because of the new users, and so on and so on. It's been like that since I joined two and a half years ago.

I agree, it's a fairly constant theme. But... 1) It's been a while, so worth the reminder; and 2) It's actually a submission from someone whose been here a while. The last several were from people with So: worth a little bit of +1 action, but I certainly hope it doesn't 'stay at the top for a while' as someone else said. Hoarding one of the 'above the fold' slots would be a bummer.

We're supposed to ignore the fold now aren't we? :)

Re: Kind reminder: please (re)read the HN guidelines

#25
post #10

I'm pleased to see that I am officially allowed to complain that HNN is getting to be just like Reddit.

I wish I had signed up when I started reading and not when I decided to stop lurking.

Then again, I'm pretty happy with the overall quality of the site and comments so I guess it doesn't really matter :)

Re: Kind reminder: please (re)read the HN guidelines

#26
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I still have about 3 weeks left before I can make that complaint. Luckily though, HN seems to be holding steady, and it has a long way to go before it becomes Reddit. HN is like having a conversation in your living room at a cocktail party with a lot of smart people in attendance. Reddit is like having a conversation at a sports bar with a bunch of random drunk assholes.

I think if we can get it to the point where it's like going out for beers with a bunch of smart people at a reasonably nice bar that will be perfect.

Yeah, but that's going to attract "hangers-on", isn't it? I think that's why that sort of community can either be stable or open but not both.

Re: Kind reminder: please (re)read the HN guidelines

#27
post #10

I'm pleased to see that I am officially allowed to complain that HNN is getting to be just like Reddit.

I still have about 3 weeks left before I can make that complaint. Luckily though, HN seems to be holding steady, and it has a long way to go before it becomes Reddit. HN is like having a conversation in your living room at a cocktail party with a lot of smart people in attendance. Reddit is like having a conversation at a sports bar with a bunch of random drunk assholes.

You should check out some of the smaller subreddit communities. For example, r/coding is extremely nerdy and has virtually 0 drunk assholes.

Re: Kind reminder: please (re)read the HN guidelines

#28
One question I ask myself now before commenting is: Will this comment significantly improve this conversation?

I try not to comment if the comment is merely:

1. clever and amusing 2. expressing anger/disagreement 3. disproving a wrong but unimportant claim made by another commenter.

Besides these, submitting, upvoting, downvoting, not voting and flagging are enough to make HN more interesting for myself.

Re: Kind reminder: please (re)read the HN guidelines

#30
post #10

I'm pleased to see that I am officially allowed to complain that HNN is getting to be just like Reddit.

Hacker News is starting to feel like programming.reddit.com a year ago. Now, Reddit is getting more and more like Digg a year before that. Digg certainly looks like Youtube comments one year before. Now, Youtube, that surely is now just like Myspace some time before. And Myspace now is somewhere close to what the AOL forums used to be. But AOL - don't look at the AOL forums! they now look as bad as Usenet did when everyone joined there, before they were Google groups, before they were called DejaVu, when all the newbies had just spoiled all the good old newsgroups.

We should all return to Usenet. There's nobody there, and we could build a cozy place with no trolls and newbies, and share really interesting stuff and discuss it intelligently.

But I'm sure the dumbfucks will follow us around, from here to the end of time.

Post reply on HN