Huge Commercial Cave in the Ozarks for Sale
21–30 of 51 posts
Re: Huge Commercial Cave in the Ozarks for Sale
#22I wonder if using the caves could be used to hold a small datacenter with minimal cooling costs. (Maybe a geothermal cooling loop?)
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SubTropolis
[2] https://stckc.com/Re: Huge Commercial Cave in the Ozarks for Sale
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
How does the fact that the preppers are rich argue against being wary of them?
Well there's a general perception of preppers as being paranoid, gun-toting, aggressive hillbillies, and the fact that it's often done by the top 1% shows that it's kind of an inaccurate stereotype.
Re: Huge Commercial Cave in the Ozarks for Sale
#24The caves look cool but the Prepper links on that page make me very wary of the kinds of neighbors you'd have there!
Re: Huge Commercial Cave in the Ozarks for Sale
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
<$1M for 186 acres plus a massive cave with tons of commercial infrastructure within it? No, it's almost surely over a million, especially if a good chunk of that 186 acres is farmable.
Here's a lead on it: http://marionrecord.com/direct/this_man_cave_is_not_metaphor... Here we go, recently listed at $400,000: http://www.mossyoakproperties.com/land/23324 So unless a lot of work was put into it, probably still around there. The website is still up: http://www.hurricanerivercaverns.com/
Re: Huge Commercial Cave in the Ozarks for Sale
#26Genuinly nice and efficient (fast to load and scroll) website design. Of course looking at the HTML code removes the illusion of sleek hand coding, instead a now dated proprietery program seems to have been used. But still better than a slow page involving 100 JS frameworks to display a single article :)
Baffled by the ugly=better trend on HN and elsewhere. The linked site scores low in readability and overall UX, this "still better than a ReactJS site" mentality has to die.
Re: Huge Commercial Cave in the Ozarks for Sale
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
Baffled by the ugly=better trend on HN and elsewhere. The linked site scores low in readability and overall UX, this "still better than a ReactJS site" mentality has to die.
Elaborate on the "low in readability and overall UX". It loaded fast, and didn't use a cpu intensive client side animation that doesn't add to readability. It's not a paragon of design, but it was refreshing to have a single page of text that didn't download a few mbs in libraries and css, have constant tracking requests, or have animations or visualization that didn't add to my understanding of the content.
- Arbitrarily changing text effects/color/padding.
- Not responsive. On my laptop, I have to scroll left/right to see all pics
- Nav is below the fold, I have to scroll down to see it.
- Broken text hover effects
Sure, it doesn't track you or download 100 js files, but you can't score a site based on what it doesn't have.
Re: Huge Commercial Cave in the Ozarks for Sale
#28If you're Lex Luther, this would be ideal for your HQ2.
Re: Huge Commercial Cave in the Ozarks for Sale
#29Re: Huge Commercial Cave in the Ozarks for Sale
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
Elaborate on the "low in readability and overall UX". It loaded fast, and didn't use a cpu intensive client side animation that doesn't add to readability. It's not a paragon of design, but it was refreshing to have a single page of text that didn't download a few mbs in libraries and css, have constant tracking requests, or have animations or visualization that didn't add to my understanding of the content.
> Elaborate... - Arbitrarily changing text effects/color/padding. - Not responsive. On my laptop, I have to scroll left/right to see all pics - Nav is below the fold, I have to scroll down to see it. - Broken text hover effects Sure, it doesn't track you or download 100 js files, but you can't score a site based on what it doesn't have.
Well judging by the positive reaction by a non-negligible number of people, the lack of javascript bloat may be something valued by many on this site.