Live data from Hacker News

Ciao, Chrome: Firefox Quantum Is the Browser Built for 2017

wired.com

21–30 of 340 posts

Re: Ciao, Chrome: Firefox Quantum Is the Browser Built for 2017

#23
post #8
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oh, that's great news. Blocking fake news sources would get me to try to switch some relatives back over to Firefox.

in addition to the closet racists, the last election seems to be outing the closet fascists.

Fake news sites (real fake news, not how Trump uses it) are malware for the mind. These are things that are 100% fictional and made up to deceive readers for clicks.

Re: Ciao, Chrome: Firefox Quantum Is the Browser Built for 2017

#24
post #23
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

in addition to the closet racists, the last election seems to be outing the closet fascists.

Fake news sites (real fake news, not how Trump uses it) are malware for the mind. These are things that are 100% fictional and made up to deceive readers for clicks.

> "real fake news"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery_slope

or (to play coy): you're suggesting we block fiction from the internet...?

Re: Ciao, Chrome: Firefox Quantum Is the Browser Built for 2017

#25
post #9
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Plenty of great email, contacts and calendar services out there, you just need to pay for them. I went with FastMail and it’s been absolutely painless.

Any recommendations for a Google Drive replacement?

It isn't for everyone, but I host my own NextCloud instance on a personal server. Works fine after a bit of tweaking, but it can be a pain to set up.

Re: Ciao, Chrome: Firefox Quantum Is the Browser Built for 2017

#26
post #20
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Source? Can’t find anything online that indicates they are partnering with political activists to block websites.

https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2017/08/08/mozilla-information...

Thanks, although link doesn’t support anything in parent commenter’s claim.

Re: Ciao, Chrome: Firefox Quantum Is the Browser Built for 2017

#27
post #7
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Same here, but I guess getting out of gmail and calendar will be tricky.

Plenty of great email, contacts and calendar services out there, you just need to pay for them. I went with FastMail and it’s been absolutely painless.

I fear the actual migration, not the alternatives

Re: Ciao, Chrome: Firefox Quantum Is the Browser Built for 2017

#28
I wish they had some better UX designers. Hit the download button and I get a .bz2 file with no install scripts whatsoever.

    $ tar jxvf firefox-57.0.tar.bz2
    $ cd firefox
    $ mkdir /usr/local/firefox
    mkdir: cannot create directory '/usr/local/firefox': Permission denied
    $ sudo su
    Password:
    # mkdir /usr/local/firefox
    # cp -rv * /usr/local/firefox/
    ...
    # ln -s /usr/local/firefox/firefox /usr/bin/firefox 
    ln: failed to create symbolic link '/usr/bin/firefox': File exists
    # mv /usr/bin/firefox /usr/bin/firefox.bac
    # ln -s /usr/local/firefox/firefox /usr/bin/firefox
Why couldn't they go the extra mile and give me a .deb file I can just click and install or dpkg -i, like Chrome does? Make it absolutely frictionless -- lubricate the whole process -- if you want people to use it instead of Chrome.

Re: Ciao, Chrome: Firefox Quantum Is the Browser Built for 2017

#29

Anyone have thoughts on the opt-out telemetry default? I had to read the privacy notice they open on start to find out that telemetry was enabled by default.

My gut reaction was to be suspicious of Mozilla, but then I remembered that they're Mozilla. They're probably just trying to figure out which features are confusing for users.

It's strange because we do this type of tracking in all facets of webapps, but desktop apps trigger our suspicion meter.

Re: Ciao, Chrome: Firefox Quantum Is the Browser Built for 2017

#30
And yet 95% of the time I try to watch YouTube in Firefox, it just hangs, never actually playing. Yet Chrome works flawlessly every time.

I'm not saying Google is doing anything malicious here, I think it's more of a "we put a lot more effort into making YouTube work" kinda thing.

Post reply on HN