I'll be more specific. In microeconomics (aka price theory), a monopolist is the sole supplier of a good or service at a time/place/condition. The monopolist faces a downward sloping supply curve. In a competitive equilibrium the supply/demand picture we all know is meant to cover an entire industry, while each seller acts as a price taker (same as a horizontal demand curve).

In reality, as you point out, each firm has at least some pricing power, for various reasons, and so from a theoretical perspective they are a monopolist in some good or service defined in the right way. However, In common and legal usage they are not a monopolist.