Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well lots of software like Ruby is a pain in the ass to install. Package managers make plenty of sense there. But Go is as easy as it comes. I was just offering that since this seems like a time-sensitive update.
This has nothing to do with Go being easy or hard to install, and everything to do with giving people a uniform way to manage installation, updates and removal of software, independent of what software that is.
Go 1.9.1 and Go 1.8.4 are released
21–30 of 33 posts
Re: Go 1.9.1 and Go 1.8.4 are released
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
This has nothing to do with Go being easy or hard to install, and everything to do with giving people a uniform way to manage installation, updates and removal of software, independent of what software that is.
OK. Well, for what it's worth, I use ubuntu and find it much easier to install Go using their website than using apt (which I do use for most things). Thanks for the downvotes guys.
brew install go
No sudo required, nor 'update' command required first, etc.Re: Go 1.9.1 and Go 1.8.4 are released
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which problem do you mean? Both are relatively minor on a scale from "meh" to "OMG shut everything down!". Every major project has security bugs now and then. There are many mail clients that will send passwords over non-TLS links (that was standard practice for decades...and you can still convince many mail clients to do it without much fanfare). This change prevents foot-shooting and that's good, but, the fact that…
> Which problem do you mean? I was referring to the SMTP issue. I should have made that more clear. > Both are relatively minor on a scale from "meh" to "OMG shut everything down!". Every major project has security bugs now and then. Definitely. I don't think the problem itself is that bad. My main issue is that it was introduced with the ramifications in mind (see the original issue) and an RFC specifically stating…
Re: Go 1.9.1 and Go 1.8.4 are released
#24Re: Go 1.9.1 and Go 1.8.4 are released
#25Why are there parallel releases on 1.8.x and 1.9.x?
Re: Go 1.9.1 and Go 1.8.4 are released
#26If we installed with brew how long for 1.9.1 to propagate there?
Go is really easy to install manually. Just download from the official golang.org website.
I can probably stop now.
Re: Go 1.9.1 and Go 1.8.4 are released
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
This has nothing to do with Go being easy or hard to install, and everything to do with giving people a uniform way to manage installation, updates and removal of software, independent of what software that is.
OK. Well, for what it's worth, I use ubuntu and find it much easier to install Go using their website than using apt (which I do use for most things). Thanks for the downvotes guys.
Re: Go 1.9.1 and Go 1.8.4 are released
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
OK. Well, for what it's worth, I use ubuntu and find it much easier to install Go using their website than using apt (which I do use for most things). Thanks for the downvotes guys.
This was in reference to Homebrew, though. In Homebrew, installing Go is simply: brew install go No sudo required, nor 'update' command required first, etc.
Re: Go 1.9.1 and Go 1.8.4 are released
#29go: unknown subcommand "update" Run 'go help' for usage.
Re: Go 1.9.1 and Go 1.8.4 are released
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
This was in reference to Homebrew, though. In Homebrew, installing Go is simply: brew install go No sudo required, nor 'update' command required first, etc.
I don’t use Homebrew, given that Go is now written in Go, how does Homebrew bootstrap it when there are no binaries available? Does it download Go 1.4, builds it with a C compiler and uses that to build the latest version?
[1] https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/blob/master/Formul... [2] https://github.com/golang/go/blob/master/src/bootstrap.bash