Live data from Hacker News

Zuckerberg admits working for man claiming Facebook ownership

theregister.co.uk

21–30 of 67 posts

Re: Zuckerberg admits working for man claiming Facebook ownership

#21
post #17

The nature this case in relation to how it is being reported fascinates me. Let me summarize while making a few observations: 1. A guy comes out of nowhere and files a lawsuit in a state court in Allegany County, New York (population: about 50,000 - http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/36/36003.html ). 2. The lawsuit is filed on June 30, 2010 and consists of a grand total of 2 pages of allegations, coupled with a…

I wish I could subscribe to your HN comments as a RSS feed.

Re: Zuckerberg admits working for man claiming Facebook ownership

#22

Of all the speculation on what could kill Facebook, did anyone ever imagine it might be a "wood fuel salesman" from New York? Sometimes truth is stranger than fiction.

Unless the fiction is a Cohen Brothers movie. In that I could see Facebook being killed off by a wood fuel salesman from New York.

Re: Zuckerberg admits working for man claiming Facebook ownership

#24
post #17

The nature this case in relation to how it is being reported fascinates me. Let me summarize while making a few observations: 1. A guy comes out of nowhere and files a lawsuit in a state court in Allegany County, New York (population: about 50,000 - http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/36/36003.html ). 2. The lawsuit is filed on June 30, 2010 and consists of a grand total of 2 pages of allegations, coupled with a…

While I think you're probably absolutely correct from a legal perspective, I also think that you're missing the point. This is interesting precisely because the contract is so amateurish, yet it appears that Zuckerberg actually signed the damned thing! As bizarre and weak as the claims may be to a lawyer, to a layman, this is the clearest evidence yet that Zuckerberg was involved in some shady dealings early in Facebook history. And this time, unlike the rich kids involved in the previous dispute, we've got an amateur investor, who can't afford competent legal counsel.

You're thinking like a lawyer, and focusing on the technicalities of the case. Everyone else is taking the contract at face value. If Zuckerberg gets out of this on a legal technicality, it's because he's damned lucky that the contract he signed wasn't written by a better attorney. Frankly, I doubt that most laypeople like the precedent of that outcome.

Re: Zuckerberg admits working for man claiming Facebook ownership

#25
post #17

The nature this case in relation to how it is being reported fascinates me. Let me summarize while making a few observations: 1. A guy comes out of nowhere and files a lawsuit in a state court in Allegany County, New York (population: about 50,000 - http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/36/36003.html ). 2. The lawsuit is filed on June 30, 2010 and consists of a grand total of 2 pages of allegations, coupled with a…

I wish I could subscribe to your HN comments as a RSS feed.

http://searchyc.com/user/grellas?only=comments --> http://rss.searchyc.com/user/grellas?only=comments

Re: Zuckerberg admits working for man claiming Facebook ownership

#26
post #17

The nature this case in relation to how it is being reported fascinates me. Let me summarize while making a few observations: 1. A guy comes out of nowhere and files a lawsuit in a state court in Allegany County, New York (population: about 50,000 - http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/36/36003.html ). 2. The lawsuit is filed on June 30, 2010 and consists of a grand total of 2 pages of allegations, coupled with a…

Yet, in spite of all this, the reporting on it is building continual momentum such that it is perceived as a serious problem for the company.

Despite the shoddiness of Mr. Ceglia's case against FB, at what point does the price of negative publicity outweigh the price of a cheap settlement for FB?

Re: Zuckerberg admits working for man claiming Facebook ownership

#27

Why would a Harvard student give up 50%+ of ownership for a mere $1000?

Also, why didn't he resolve the situation by either starting a new company or buying back his shares as soon as it was apparent Facebook could become something big?

possibly because he is/was young and naive

Re: Zuckerberg admits working for man claiming Facebook ownership

#28
post #16

Why would a Harvard student give up 50%+ of ownership for a mere $1000?

$1000 of weed/beer in exchange for 50% of a worthless venture probably sounded ok at the time.

No, that's still a stupid proposition. Most Harvard students are presumbly pretty damned well off in the first place. Also, now that we've seen Zuck after the fact, you can't deny he is reasonably intelligent. Seems like a completely non-standard move imo.

Even though I surely could use the money I'm way too arrogant to give up 50% of something I'm working on. I think the entire planet knows how arrogant Zuck is (not necessarily a bad thing).

Re: Zuckerberg admits working for man claiming Facebook ownership

#29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Also, why didn't he resolve the situation by either starting a new company or buying back his shares as soon as it was apparent Facebook could become something big?

possibly because he is/was young and naive

Yes, but this is the sort of thing that should have come up during the due diligence of the very first round of funding.

Re: Zuckerberg admits working for man claiming Facebook ownership

#30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What exactly would be a decent offer considering the valuation of FB?

As commented in another thread, it would be ludicrous for Microsoft, Digital Sky Technologies et al. to allow Mr. Ceglia a seat on Facebook's board. They will explore and deploy every legal option to avoid this. It is not so ludicrous for investment bankers to engineer a tax-minimal FU-style lifestyle for Mr. Ceglia by endowing a non-profit for some pet interest of his choice and paying him handsomely. If Mr. Ceglia…

And the twist is if Ceglia truly did have this contract with Zuckerberg, it leaves the ConnectU guys in a particular interesting situation.

No it doesn't. The issue was never "who thought of Facebook first". All of this was when Myspace was at it's peak. Everyone had the idea to do a Myspace competitor.

The issue is Zuckerberg taking people's money and making false commitments by accepting a job and lying to the ConnectU guys that he was still working on it to delay them as much as he could.

Post reply on HN