This has not been well thought out for part of the world. https://www.pri.org/stories/2012-08-13/expand-job-opportunit...
Can still use a passcode
Face ID is replacing Touch ID on the new iPhone X
21–30 of 81 posts
Re: Face ID is replacing Touch ID on the new iPhone X
#22Why'd Apple choose to make the iPhone X out of stainless steel? Titanium, for example, would be half the weight and much more interesting..
Re: Face ID is replacing Touch ID on the new iPhone X
#23Why'd Apple choose to make the iPhone X out of stainless steel? Titanium, for example, would be half the weight and much more interesting..
I think steel is easier to manufacture and more abundant.
Re: Face ID is replacing Touch ID on the new iPhone X
#24so instead of stealing your finger print it's now enough to get a picture?
You really didn't read the article did you. Second paragraph says "Apple says the facial scan is so accurate there’s now only a 1 in 1,000,000 chance of another random person’s face being able to unlock your phone. This is much better than the 1 in 50,000 error rate for Touch ID. And no, holding a photo up of someone can’t unlock their phone – nor can a Hollywood-grade face mask, which (shown below) were used by Appl…
Re: Face ID is replacing Touch ID on the new iPhone X
#25Re: Face ID is replacing Touch ID on the new iPhone X
#26Re: Face ID is replacing Touch ID on the new iPhone X
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think steel is easier to manufacture and more abundant.
But it's supposed to be the no cost-cutting, ultra premium version of the iPhone. It costs a thousand dollars. They could've used titanium
Re: Face ID is replacing Touch ID on the new iPhone X
#28This has not been well thought out for part of the world. https://www.pri.org/stories/2012-08-13/expand-job-opportunit...
Re: Face ID is replacing Touch ID on the new iPhone X
#29Why'd Apple choose to make the iPhone X out of stainless steel? Titanium, for example, would be half the weight and much more interesting..
Re: Face ID is replacing Touch ID on the new iPhone X
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think steel is easier to manufacture and more abundant.
But it's supposed to be the no cost-cutting, ultra premium version of the iPhone. It costs a thousand dollars. They could've used titanium
You've got to remember they sell nearly 50 million of these things every quarter. They don't just appear out of thin air.