Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Introducing Atom-IDE

blog.atom.io

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

21–30 of 324 posts

Re: Introducing Atom-IDE

#21

Post by hacker_9 »

Tenobrus wrote: post #13
hacker_9 wrote: post #10

Honestly can't see why I'd use this - I have all the professional grade IDEs I need, why do I need one that is written in JS, is slower and consumes 5x more memory? Not to mention IDEs already have their own extension stores too. This seems like an 'IDE-lite', which doesn't make much sense in a world where professional grade IDEs are free.

The same reason thousands of programmers use Vim or Emacs with various extensions as their development environment. It allows the same editing experience across multiple languages. A consistent interface, lack of need for learning many (often very different) IDEs, less proprietary annoyance, many many more options for customization, much easier to port your setup to various platforms, etc. Admittedly I don't think At…

But that's what I mean - we already have Emacs/Vim, with their million of extensions, which are always going to be faster. Outside of that we have Visual Studio, IntelliJ, PyCharm, the list goes on. All downloadable for free.

Re: Introducing Atom-IDE

#24

Post by simlevesque »

hacker_9 wrote: post #21
Tenobrus wrote: post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The same reason thousands of programmers use Vim or Emacs with various extensions as their development environment. It allows the same editing experience across multiple languages. A consistent interface, lack of need for learning many (often very different) IDEs, less proprietary annoyance, many many more options for customization, much easier to port your setup to various platforms, etc. Admittedly I don't think At…

But that's what I mean - we already have Emacs/Vim, with their million of extensions, which are always going to be faster. Outside of that we have Visual Studio, IntelliJ, PyCharm, the list goes on. All downloadable for free.

> going to be faster

Fast is not the end goal.

Re: Introducing Atom-IDE

#26

Post by [deleted] »

hacker_9 wrote: post #21
Tenobrus wrote: post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The same reason thousands of programmers use Vim or Emacs with various extensions as their development environment. It allows the same editing experience across multiple languages. A consistent interface, lack of need for learning many (often very different) IDEs, less proprietary annoyance, many many more options for customization, much easier to port your setup to various platforms, etc. Admittedly I don't think At…

But that's what I mean - we already have Emacs/Vim, with their million of extensions, which are always going to be faster. Outside of that we have Visual Studio, IntelliJ, PyCharm, the list goes on. All downloadable for free.

[deleted]

Re: Introducing Atom-IDE

#27

Post by 482794793792894 »

thrillgore wrote: post #2

I hope they address memory consumption at some point too.

Most of the RAM use comes from its architecture (it basically runs a web browser to display the UI), so this isn't a problem that they can just address. They'd have to rewrite the entire text editor with a different technology.

Re: Introducing Atom-IDE

#28

Post by coldtea »

jamescostian wrote: post #7

In my opinion, this is how IDEs should be - make something better described as a text editor (like a fresh install of vim, sublime, or atom), and allow users to add more things to the light-weight(ish?) base. So many IDEs are overkill. Text editors with the right plugins can accomplish the same things but also be much more lightweight, and help you achieve a balance between "IDE" and "text editor"

>Text editors with the right plugins can accomplish the same things but also be much more lightweight

Oh, the irony...

Re: Introducing Atom-IDE

#29

Post by slaymaker1907 »

Tenobrus wrote: post #13
hacker_9 wrote: post #10

Honestly can't see why I'd use this - I have all the professional grade IDEs I need, why do I need one that is written in JS, is slower and consumes 5x more memory? Not to mention IDEs already have their own extension stores too. This seems like an 'IDE-lite', which doesn't make much sense in a world where professional grade IDEs are free.

The same reason thousands of programmers use Vim or Emacs with various extensions as their development environment. It allows the same editing experience across multiple languages. A consistent interface, lack of need for learning many (often very different) IDEs, less proprietary annoyance, many many more options for customization, much easier to port your setup to various platforms, etc. Admittedly I don't think At…

I find Atom to be the best editor for Markdown, though not much else. In particular, it has superb support for Pandoc as well as a good spell corrector built in.

Re: Introducing Atom-IDE

#30

Post by coldtea »

tvanantwerp wrote: post #4

> [Utilize] the power of language servers to provide deep syntactical analysis of your code and projects. Having my code analyzed by others' servers just so I can have better autocomplete does not sound like something I want.

Language servers are local services that analyze the code outside of your editor (and can be used by several editors etc). It's a protocol that got big the last 2 years or so.

It doesn't refer to servers in some Cloud.

Post reply on HN