It's cool to see that much dedication. It's useful when people take the time to summarize knowledge in a book to serve as reference. But ... I have the feeling that the author, who is relatively new to the field (by his own admission), expanded a lot of formulas and made certain parts of the theory more complicated than it should be. Look around page 60. There are formulas with 6 summation signs in front of them, wit…
See author's note excerpted below; that was an explicit goal of the project. > This work has no benefit nor added value to the deep learning topic on its own. It is just the reformulation of ideas of brighter researchers to fit a peculiar mindset: the one of preferring formulas with ten indices but where one knows precisely what one is manipulating rather than (in my opinion sometimes opaque) matrix formulations wher…
Re: Technical Book on Deep Learning
#21I had not caught that note from the author. Thanks for pointing it out.