Earlier quoted context omitted.
> No, there doesn't. Nazism had its chance. We fought a world war over it. As did Communism, and we fought a Cold War over that. A "white nationalist" (apparently) ran someone over with his car, while a communist is currently threatening to nuke the United States. Nuking a country has to be worse than running over a single person, right? If not, why not? Maybe next we can shut down all communist web sites. After the…
> As did Communism, and we fought a Cold War over that. You know this is a false equivalence - they're not even remotely comparable. > a communist is currently threatening to nuke the United States [...] has to be worse than running over a single person Again with the false equivalences. Also I don't think Kim Jong-Un is a Communist - they have collective farms, sure, but the country is much more a dictatorship than…
"False equivalence" how? Communists have murdered way more people than the Nazis ever did.
> Also I don't think Kim Jong-Un is a Communist - they have collective farms, sure, but the country is much more a dictatorship than anything.
Can you give me an example of a Communist country that isn't a dictatorship?
The "But that wasn't real communism!" argument doesn't fly any more.