Live data from Hacker News

Humans want equality – as long as the rich stay rich and the poor stay poor

qz.com

21–23 of 23 posts

Re: Humans want equality – as long as the rich stay rich and the poor stay poor

#21
It's easy to fall into this trap of thinking that we need to hold out our hands and ask (beg?) for wealth distribution. But this mentality of expecting someone else to come to the rescue is why we remain "poorer" than these other people. Especially now that we all have access to the world's information - it should be easier than ever to take care of ourselves and even coordinate boycotts of useless goods and services that the rich rent-collectors use to reap the harvest of proletarian dollars.

The founders of places like America and Rome were self-sufficient agrarians. The appeal of these places was that they were new and independent of other powers. The people that settled there were escaping the rich city folk in cultures that had already been developed.

But a century of rapid industrialization has yielded less capable, reliant people that have gradually lost their way of providing for themselves. Media has poisoned the minds of economic participants, from a young age, to desire more/bigger things than their neighbor, and that is a primary factor in the simple desire to be "rich".

These days there aren't really any new areas like these aforementioned to "discover" and cultivate (perhaps Alaska, but this place is not for weak people which in turn makes it exclusive to more virtuous citizenry).

Constant growth and expansion at all costs is what cancer cells do.

"You're an entrepreneur, so you're wanting to grow your business. How do you grow?"

"I'll throw you a curve ball - we don't want to grow."

https://youtu.be/4MdFSbFlksI?t=1118

Re: Humans want equality – as long as the rich stay rich and the poor stay poor

#23
post #2

If the world actually equitably shared wealth, the western would have an absolutely astounding drop in our incomes and quality of life. Few would accept this. The average person in the first world has a massively higher quality of life than developing countries. This is why the only long term answer is technological development, without which we would all still be subsistence farming (and all poor). It would be nice…

There is a correlation between having wealth, and being able to make the best of it.

If there was a wealth sharing event, a vast amount would be lost, and inequality would rise again. monetary equality without equality of personal value (skills, qualifications) and motivation (behavior, habits) is moot.

Also, for some, the lack of equality of those fronts might be spent, instead, on criminal enterprises - money is power after all, and power corrupts. Then there would be more crooks among the wealthy.

Post reply on HN