Live data from Hacker News

Cicada – Decentralized Application and Direct Democracy Platform

iamcicada.com

21–30 of 34 posts

Re: Cicada – Decentralized Application and Direct Democracy Platform

#21
post #16
post #7

Not sure I see how this avoids an inevitable mining arms race (if it is indeed claiming to avoid such a thing). Even if miners are randomly drafted into random pools, the more miners you create, the more income. Seems like a very game-able system.

The paper linked on github mentions that people are limited to only run a single miner. I haven't parsed it all yet but I think they intend to use the biometrics/HUID to enforce this. Among other concerns, I'm not sure where this leaves folks with injured or missing retinas. Or what might stop people from selling vote or mining capacity by proxy.

When I read about using both iris as unique identifier, it came to my mind this question:

The iris of a living been do not change with age ?

Re: Cicada – Decentralized Application and Direct Democracy Platform

#22
post #4

Branding and name immediately reminded me of Cicada 3301: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cicada_3301 Haven't had a chance to fully evaluate yet but I do like that they're taking inspiration from scifi.

I thought of the same thing. I have a feeling it's not the same organization however because when Cicada 3301 refers to themselves, they use 3301 rather than Cicada.

Re: Cicada – Decentralized Application and Direct Democracy Platform

#23
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Cryptocurrency first being described in Cryptonomicon Really? That's crazy! I always thought that Stephenson had heard early ideas about cryptocurrencies and incorporated them into his book. Are you saying the Neil Stephenson invented the concept of a cryptocurrency?

It seems like you know the answer and you're being passive-aggressive about it. Are you thinking the OP doesn't know about David Chaum?

I know about Chaum, but I was off on when Cryptonomicon was written.

Re: Cicada – Decentralized Application and Direct Democracy Platform

#27
When I first saw this site a few months ago I got quite excited. I was looking for a solution to Sybil Attacks so I liked it on github and read the whitepaper.

The "Human Unique Identifier" is supposed to solve Sybil Attacks. But I don't see how if the enrollment of new users is decentralized bad actors can't simply generate new retinas / HUIDs and enroll them in the system, then use those identities to sway online elections, commit fraud, mine disproportionately more coins, etc.

I'm always looking for fun sci-fi, but the book by Dan Jeffries doesn't contain much of this tech, which was disappointing. It was an OK read otherwise. I think "Infomocracy" was better and contained more novel concepts.

Re: Cicada – Decentralized Application and Direct Democracy Platform

#28
post #27

When I first saw this site a few months ago I got quite excited. I was looking for a solution to Sybil Attacks so I liked it on github and read the whitepaper. The "Human Unique Identifier" is supposed to solve Sybil Attacks. But I don't see how if the enrollment of new users is decentralized bad actors can't simply generate new retinas / HUIDs and enroll them in the system, then use those identities to sway online e…

Agreed, I'm not seeing any protection against simply using fake photoshopped pictures of eyes.

It appears they're envisioning an encrypted microkernel which digests the bio data, generates a public key, and pushes it to a blockchain filled with similar data for the whole world population. So I suppose they could be planning to build some kind of signature into the microkernel itself so that outgoing messages sent from a patched or fraudulent process would be noticed. So I guess that could be used to prevent against the even simpler attack of generating the digests of the biodata, as opposed to the biodata itself.

Still, it all seems pretty hand-wavy.

Post reply on HN