Live data from Hacker News

Lbry.io – decentralized digital library

lbry.io

21–30 of 94 posts

Re: Lbry.io – decentralized digital library

#21
post #15

Company is a bit tone def when it was pointed out they have a all male team https://twitter.com/LBRYio/status/843865332771164160

They have almost no staff, what is more, even if they have 10000 male staff only, that is up to them. If you don't like it, start your own company and concentrate on your own business filling your own sense of political correctness.

Re: Lbry.io – decentralized digital library

#22
post #16
post #15

Company is a bit tone def when it was pointed out they have a all male team https://twitter.com/LBRYio/status/843865332771164160

A team consisting of four people. Is this really a problem? It's probably just a bunch of friends that decided to try an idea. Seriously, what are they supposed to do to resolve it? Fire two partners and hire two women just to make an equality quota? Hire four new women just on the merit of being women?

> A team consisting of four people.

I count thirteen: https://lbry.io/team

Re: Lbry.io – decentralized digital library

#23
post #15

Company is a bit tone def when it was pointed out they have a all male team https://twitter.com/LBRYio/status/843865332771164160

Why is it even worth pointing out there team has no women? The original "call out" tweet was very snarky. There are 9 staff, not including a few advisors. So its probably the case that they all knew each other before the comapny existed. If there were no women in their lab, theres not much they can do about that. What would the correct response be? "Sorry we didn't know any women when we started, we shouldnt have don…

The initial tweet was not even snarky. It was just trolling. As with most trolling, it should have simply been ignored.

The responses are the damaging aspect here. "Our salaries are low" and "we don't have any EAs" are just painfully bad ways to respond.

Re: Lbry.io – decentralized digital library

#24

Small tip: you can add a dark background to the header through CSS for those who don't have the image in cache. Right now, while loading it's white text over white background.

Great suggestion! Done.

https://github.com/lbryio/lbry.io/commit/ab6a3fe538f5c55e1f3...

If you're in our Slack, DM me a wallet address at @kauffj for a tip!

Re: Lbry.io – decentralized digital library

#25
post #4

I'm still going through the docs and all so this probably has been answered before : How do you deal with takedown and dcma requests? I know ipfs for example has a blacklist for dcma requests. I'm trying to understand what keeps someone from copying a video and sharing it for less or uploading a movie or TV series.

Similarly. We will maintain a similar list and official releases will respect this list.

This does not remove the blockchain entry, since this is impossible, but it would be irresponsible and illegal in most countries to continue to host content on this list.

Here's a legal memo the wonderful people at Cardozo drafted for us: https://www.dropbox.com/s/70uezh44ct0244c/LBRY-SecondaryLiab...

We've also spent an unfortunate amount of money on legal fees.

Re: Lbry.io – decentralized digital library

#28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why is it even worth pointing out there team has no women? The original "call out" tweet was very snarky. There are 9 staff, not including a few advisors. So its probably the case that they all knew each other before the comapny existed. If there were no women in their lab, theres not much they can do about that. What would the correct response be? "Sorry we didn't know any women when we started, we shouldnt have don…

I agree with your general sentiment, but their response does sound a bit weird. It would have been fine with me if they had said "oh it's just by chance, plus most of us knew eachother from before we started". Saying "we have no female roles" and "oh we get paid less so we're all women" (wtf?) isn't handling the situation well.

It was a crass and tone-deaf attempt on our part to signal awareness.

Lesson learned. Subsequent attempts to engage sincerely were also met with derision, so I'm not sure anything could have ever been done that wouldn't have been met similarly.

Re: Lbry.io – decentralized digital library

#29
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Isn't that addressed by this FAQ entry? > Rest assured, we’re implementing permanent URLs that are always yours. https://lbry.io/faq/no-auction-options

Yes, but they will just be randomly generated strings, that doesn't really sound appealing. Also they don't exist yet.

That FAQ article is old and I'm going to update it to point at https://lbry.io/faq/naming. You can get names as short as:

lbry://name#a

Where #a can actually be that short.

If you want a name with no identifiers or filters at all, the voting system will continue to be used.

Re: Lbry.io – decentralized digital library

#30
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A team consisting of four people. Is this really a problem? It's probably just a bunch of friends that decided to try an idea. Seriously, what are they supposed to do to resolve it? Fire two partners and hire two women just to make an equality quota? Hire four new women just on the merit of being women?

> A team consisting of four people. I count thirteen: https://lbry.io/team

Thanks. Apologies for not looking at it into detail. The Twitter link only showed the first four.
Post reply on HN