Live data from Hacker News

10^6 Giraffes

onemilliongiraffes.com

21–30 of 37 posts

Re: 10^6 Giraffes

#22

I can't wait for RiderOfGiraffes to get wind of this project ... http://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=RiderOfGiraffes

Nothing to do with me, but I watch with interest. Sadly I can't send a photo of my giraffes because she's store-bought.

Sorry - typo and it's too late to correct it.

s/giraffes/giraffe/

Singular. I only own one, although I have ridden several.

Re: 10^6 Giraffes

#23

I can't wait for RiderOfGiraffes to get wind of this project ... http://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=RiderOfGiraffes

Nothing to do with me, but I watch with interest. Sadly I can't send a photo of my giraffes because she's store-bought.

Get artistic and draw a picture of your giraffe!

Re: 10^6 Giraffes

#24

Wikipedia puts the total African giraffe population at 110,000-150,000: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giraffe . So there are more pictures of giraffes than actual giraffes.

same applies on counting human photos on social site altogether (flickr, facebook, tweetpic, etc.) would be far more than 6,819,100,000 (population of the world - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_population)

Re: 10^6 Giraffes

#26
post #24

Wikipedia puts the total African giraffe population at 110,000-150,000: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giraffe . So there are more pictures of giraffes than actual giraffes.

same applies on counting human photos on social site altogether (flickr, facebook, tweetpic, etc.) would be far more than 6,819,100,000 (population of the world - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_population )

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_population <- Anyone know the reason for the UN's low and medium estimates having serious downturns in population in the next century? Is it because of lowering child-birth rates, or because of expectations of resources/diseases, etc...?

Re: 10^6 Giraffes

#27
post #24

Wikipedia puts the total African giraffe population at 110,000-150,000: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giraffe . So there are more pictures of giraffes than actual giraffes.

same applies on counting human photos on social site altogether (flickr, facebook, tweetpic, etc.) would be far more than 6,819,100,000 (population of the world - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_population )

Keep in mind that every picture on that site is hand-made. The instructions disallow photos of actual giraffes or images created on/by a computer.

How many drawings and human-shaped sculpture are there on those social sites? I doubt there's more than the 6.8 billion you quote from wikipedia.

Re: 10^6 Giraffes

#29
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is this one submitter of Giraffes[1], responsible for two percent of all German giraffes, or this one[2], responsible for nearly five percent. I didn’t even have to look all that hard to find them. [1] http://www.onemilliongiraffes.com/search?name=Sanne [2] http://www.onemilliongiraffes.com/search?name=Ediktonia

[1] "I found 4 085 giraffes created by people named Sanne!" [2] "I found 9 988 giraffes created by people named Ediktonia!" The actual statistic is that 2% of all Germans who submitted giraffes were named Sanne and 5% were named Ediktonia. It doesn't say they were all the same person.

Click through the giraffes. They are in fact all by the same person (or by different people who are all the same age and live in the same place).

Re: 10^6 Giraffes

#30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nothing to do with me, but I watch with interest. Sadly I can't send a photo of my giraffes because she's store-bought.

Sorry - typo and it's too late to correct it. s/giraffes/giraffe/ Singular. I only own one, although I have ridden several.

That's quite the giraffe gaffe.
Post reply on HN