Thousands of U.S. locales where lead poisoning is worse than in Flint
21–30 of 56 posts
Re: Thousands of U.S. locales where lead poisoning is worse than in Flint
#22Why are there not more lawsuits? Is the scope of the damage too difficult to quantify, or the negligent parties too diffuse/remote to sue?
As much as our litigation-based culture is vilified, it can help spur action by changing the cost/benefit of doing nothing and force companies/governments to step up and fix this before more people are hurt. The risk of Mesothelioma lawsuits, for example, help add some seriousness to asbestos exposure claims.
Re: Thousands of U.S. locales where lead poisoning is worse than in Flint
#23So Reuters is finally getting around to doing their job; moving beyond a sensationalized story which sells ads, to the unglamorous work of uncovering the truth, that Flint isn't special at all and that the government knew that and has been covering it up. It's a shame they couldn't get around to reporting the truth behind the sensation a year ago when public outcry was enough to get substantial Federal funding alloca…
Flint made news because the problem was new. Flint water used to be safe, and then it became unsafe. There are a lot of problems nobody bothers with because they're not new problems.
Re: Thousands of U.S. locales where lead poisoning is worse than in Flint
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
Here is my experience FOIA requesting 100+ universities: http://austingwalters.com/foia-requesting-100-universities/ In short, you often have to get on the phone, email, snail mail, go in person, and pay quite a bit to get records. It's a very painful process. Careful what you offer lol
summary of the new star wars movie: the tale of an extremely complicated and costly FOIA request
Re: Thousands of U.S. locales where lead poisoning is worse than in Flint
#25Utilities remains a major pain in USA partly because of the ridiculous government control which invariably leads to corruption.
I have been exclusively using distilled water in Sunnyvale for last 3 years. Water in Sunnyvale has dangerous levels of pesticides if not lead.
Re: Thousands of U.S. locales where lead poisoning is worse than in Flint
#26Instead, Reuters sought testing data at the neighborhood level, in census tracts or zip code areas, submitting records requests to all 50 states. Too bed there's no way to study the dataset directly short of repeating the process.
I'll pay for and perform the FOIA requests through muckrock.com if you do the analysis.
Re: Thousands of U.S. locales where lead poisoning is worse than in Flint
#27and these same people vote in people that shut down the epa and do everything possible to poison their children. let them get what they asked for.
Re: Thousands of U.S. locales where lead poisoning is worse than in Flint
#28Will they get the same attention? Will the nation ever upgrade and repair ancient and disastrous infrastructure?
Re: Thousands of U.S. locales where lead poisoning is worse than in Flint
#29So Reuters is finally getting around to doing their job; moving beyond a sensationalized story which sells ads, to the unglamorous work of uncovering the truth, that Flint isn't special at all and that the government knew that and has been covering it up. It's a shame they couldn't get around to reporting the truth behind the sensation a year ago when public outcry was enough to get substantial Federal funding alloca…
I wonder to what extent Michael Moore's Flint pedigree influenced the media. I'm guessing it's decidedly non-zero. Edit: this was not intended as a dig at Michael Moore or anyone else. The fact that he made a documentary featuring Flint means that more people than otherwise should be are aware of the place, hence, media stories about it are more likely to gain traction with the general population. Michael Moore human…
Re: Thousands of U.S. locales where lead poisoning is worse than in Flint
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wonder to what extent Michael Moore's Flint pedigree influenced the media. I'm guessing it's decidedly non-zero. Edit: this was not intended as a dig at Michael Moore or anyone else. The fact that he made a documentary featuring Flint means that more people than otherwise should be are aware of the place, hence, media stories about it are more likely to gain traction with the general population. Michael Moore human…
The problem is, this kind of speculation really goes nowhere. It's unprovable. And, even if there was a connection between peripheral awareness of Flint due to Moore and the legs this story has...so what?