>It is time to rethink the “good leader” prototype of being masculine, dictatorial, and charismatic. Good luck, there's a reason those attributes are dominant.
Good luck, there's a reason those attributes are dominant."
I agree, and I think it is a ridiculous and offensive conclusion that the authors are making here. They are perpetuating a stereotype of Asians based on a claim that "Eastern cultural norms encourage humility and deference to authority."
Firstly, this claim is not based on any data. I am reluctant to accept the stereotype that everyone in Asia is the opposite of "masculine, dictatorial, and charismatic," especially people who are candidates for positions of leadership. Did anyone go to Asian companies and see that all their executives are all feminine, un-charismatic, pushovers?
Secondly, even if we take this claim of an "inferior leadership culture" seriously, it can only logically apply to unassimilated Asian immigrants. What about Asian Americans, people who are born here? Are we to believe that they are all also all "feminine, un-charismatic, pushovers?"
This seems like a post hoc, pseudo-scientific justification for what is really an executive and baord level diversity issue.