Earlier quoted context omitted.
I was also having this problem. But I think one must just do away with the self imposed condition that the use of Bitcoin must abide by the law. Bitcoin is useful against capital controls. One then wonders if that was the real motivation behind Bitcoin. It's maybe not a coincidence that it has widespread use in China. I don't want to speculate any further. Just having this thought right now.
>Bitcoin is useful against capital controls. True if any only if, and the degree to which, possession of BTC is considered desirable. If it's a sought-after 'commodity'. Otherwise it's just a decentralised simulation of money, no matter how many desirable qualities it simulates. MMO games have simulated internet money, and various transfer features too. People who got into BTC early, did so because they wanted it to…
As far as I can see all useful monetary systems are essentially backed by consensus and belief.