Live data from Hacker News

FBI Reopens Clinton E-Mail Probe Less Than Two Weeks Before Vote

bloomberg.com

21–30 of 319 posts

Re: FBI Reopens Clinton E-Mail Probe Less Than Two Weeks Before Vote

#21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Impeachment and VP becomes president? Or personal pardon!

That's what I was wondering too. Can't she just pardon herself?

Presidential pardons don't apply to impeachments, I believe.

Re: FBI Reopens Clinton E-Mail Probe Less Than Two Weeks Before Vote

#22
post #9

"In connection with an unrelated case, the FBI has learned of the existence of emails" - Sounds very happenstance. What are the odds something coincidental happened two weeks before the election?

Assange has been releasing thousands of Podesta's emails in dribs and drabs every day. The Justice Department just released a lot of new information as well.

Re: FBI Reopens Clinton E-Mail Probe Less Than Two Weeks Before Vote

#23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Impeachment and VP becomes president? Or personal pardon!

That's what I was wondering too. Can't she just pardon herself?

Possibly, but pardons don't apply to impeachment, so she could still be removed as President.

Re: FBI Reopens Clinton E-Mail Probe Less Than Two Weeks Before Vote

#24
post #7

That was a very strange article with all the near-wishful "igniting speculation about a Clinton defeat" stuff. The whole emails issue has been inside baseball, politics-wise. Insiders and pundits love yelling about it but average voters either don't care (the vast majority) or have already assumed she's guilty/not guilty and priced that into their vote. Reopening the investigation is not going to change the election…

> average voters either don't care What were you saying about 'wishful thinking?' A presidential candidate under FBI investigation on election day is huge.

I agree, it is! But that still doesn't mean people (or, at least, swing voters) actually care.

Re: FBI Reopens Clinton E-Mail Probe Less Than Two Weeks Before Vote

#25
post #12
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> What happens if they find her guilty after she is elected? If it's before she takes office, Obama could pardon her. Would be a smear on the end of his legacy but might a Nixon/Ford style situation to take the personal hit and move the country forward. If it's after she takes office, most likely impeachment or resignation. It'd be very difficult govern as the chief executive if the country and world sees you as a co…

Obama pardoning Hillary would be very different than Ford's pardon of Nixon. The latter allowed a disgraced politician who had resigned to leave Washington without facing criminal prosecution. The former would allow a politician to avoid prosecution and continue to take the office of President.

> Obama pardoning Hillary would be very different than Ford's pardon of Nixon. The latter allowed a disgraced politician who had resigned to leave Washington without facing criminal prosecution. The former would allow a politician to avoid prosecution and continue to take the office of President.

Based on my take of Obama as a person, I'm pretty sure he'd require her stepping down as a condition of a pardon. Otherwise the public would question her legitimacy for four years.

Re: FBI Reopens Clinton E-Mail Probe Less Than Two Weeks Before Vote

#26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Impeachment and VP becomes president? Or personal pardon!

That's what I was wondering too. Can't she just pardon herself?

She certainly could. That is why the power of impeachment resides with Congress.

Re: FBI Reopens Clinton E-Mail Probe Less Than Two Weeks Before Vote

#27
post #19
post #7

That was a very strange article with all the near-wishful "igniting speculation about a Clinton defeat" stuff. The whole emails issue has been inside baseball, politics-wise. Insiders and pundits love yelling about it but average voters either don't care (the vast majority) or have already assumed she's guilty/not guilty and priced that into their vote. Reopening the investigation is not going to change the election…

The e-mails should have put her in prison, and they would have put anyone else in the same situation in prison. But you're right, with her being her, they're a complete nonissue. They simply don't matter at all.

To be absolutely objective about it, there really are people in prison for doing with confidential state secrets what Secretary Clinton did with confidential state secrets.

[1] http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/kristian-saucier-inves...

Re: FBI Reopens Clinton E-Mail Probe Less Than Two Weeks Before Vote

#28
To say the obvious: There is great risk of the FBI and/or Comey trying to influence the outcome of the election. Earlier, when Comey said Clinton had been "extremely careless", it seemed to overstep his bounds: He played judge and jury, and convicted her without trial.

To do this two weeks before the election raises very serious questions about the U.S.'s most fundamental institutions, rule of law, and democracy. Every Democratic leader is subject to endless investigation and deligitimization.

EDIT: This is not a partisan concern. Everyone needs these institutions, democracy and the rule of law.

Re: FBI Reopens Clinton E-Mail Probe Less Than Two Weeks Before Vote

#29
I find Comey's decision to disclose this new investigation less than 2 weeks from election day extremely perplexing.

By all means, perform your investigation, but to announce it immediately before what's arguably one of the most important elections in modern US history? If I were a paranoid man, I'd say that this looks like an attempt by an unelected official to prejudice voters.

Re: FBI Reopens Clinton E-Mail Probe Less Than Two Weeks Before Vote

#30
post #7

That was a very strange article with all the near-wishful "igniting speculation about a Clinton defeat" stuff. The whole emails issue has been inside baseball, politics-wise. Insiders and pundits love yelling about it but average voters either don't care (the vast majority) or have already assumed she's guilty/not guilty and priced that into their vote. Reopening the investigation is not going to change the election…

> average voters either don't care What were you saying about 'wishful thinking?' A presidential candidate under FBI investigation on election day is huge.

I haven't seen any numbers that indicate the nation cares either way on this. Here's some analysis of Hilary getting slight gains after the announcement that FBI wouldn't prosecute.[1] Is your comment based on polling or just gut feeling?

[1] http://www.inquisitr.com/3287325/hillary-clinton-polls-did-f...

Post reply on HN