Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm outing you as a Russian shill, but yes, there's a strange amount of Russian-blaming going on. Meanwhile, Russians are distancing themselves from American software companies. I would too in this environment.
I'm outing you as a moron.
Verizon just raised a big warning flag for Yahoo
21–30 of 57 posts
Re: Verizon just raised a big warning flag for Yahoo
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
Probably because it's off topic and not the main reason why Verizon is raising red flag. If you thought it was relevant, then a short blurb explaining your reasoning would've helped. (would be my guess)
I just thought it was interesting. What's the protocol to share something I find interesting and not directly related to the main thread? Create a whole new thread?
You've been a long timer... I think you know the protocol probably better than many others. :)
Re: Verizon just raised a big warning flag for Yahoo
#23From a thread about the data breach: > Investors are conflicted: on the one hand, Yahoo had a data breach that will cost them trust, but on the other hand, investors are surprised to hear there are still 500 million Yahoo users. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12559594
Re: Verizon just raised a big warning flag for Yahoo
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
I just thought it was interesting. What's the protocol to share something I find interesting and not directly related to the main thread? Create a whole new thread?
There was already a thread about the lawsuit, so many are probably fatigued out by it... hence the possible downvotes. You've been a long timer... I think you know the protocol probably better than many others. :)
Re: Verizon just raised a big warning flag for Yahoo
#25Lawsuit: Yahoo CEO Illegally Purged Male Workers to Replace with Women https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnrkkMtHBL0 EDIT: Haha why is this being downvoted so heavily? Is it because it's off-topic, or you don't like the suggestion that someone could be discriminatory against men, or what?
Probably because only women can be discriminated against. …Well, that, or because it's most definitely off topic.
I agree with the off topic part. But that statement is beyond crazy if you're serious.
Re: Verizon just raised a big warning flag for Yahoo
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
Now, those numbers do not explain everything. Consider Uber revenue, and operating income ... the numbers are horrible, but the overall outlook is obviously different.
Uber's revenue 2013: 160m 2014: 440m 2015: 1.5 billion Yahoo's revenue 2012 - 2015: 5 billion flat, with dip in the middle. Uber experienced explosive growth in user base... can't say the same about Yahoo. Apple - orange comparison.
Explosive growth? If you are losing money, like Uber is, that means exploding loss. Is that good?
How about operating income? They both seem to be bleeding money.
Re: Verizon just raised a big warning flag for Yahoo
#27Re: Verizon just raised a big warning flag for Yahoo
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
this... is certainly not my experience. However, they're a large organisation so they're most likely schizophrenic.
That's fair, I definitely don't have a global insight. Security teams are usually segmented in some way, rather than monolithic, with varying levels of competency among different teams. They do periodically put out some interesting reading. If you want to look at it, their annual Data Breach Investigations Report are worth checking out: http://www.verizonenterprise.com/verizon-insights-lab/dbir/ (prior year reports d…
Re: Verizon just raised a big warning flag for Yahoo
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
There was already a thread about the lawsuit, so many are probably fatigued out by it... hence the possible downvotes. You've been a long timer... I think you know the protocol probably better than many others. :)
Actually, I've only started commenting a few months ago. I also missed that thread about the lawsuit. Anyway, doesn't matter. Thanks.
Re: Verizon just raised a big warning flag for Yahoo
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
Probably because only women can be discriminated against. …Well, that, or because it's most definitely off topic.
> Probably because only women can be discriminated against. I agree with the off topic part. But that statement is beyond crazy if you're serious.