Live data from Hacker News

Yes, Everyone Really Does Hate Performance Reviews

online.wsj.com

21–23 of 23 posts

Re: Yes, Everyone Really Does Hate Performance Reviews

#21
post #7

It promotes kiss ass mentality and the only people left are the ones who blindly follow the boss. If a company ever needs to have Performance reviews, 360 degree reviews are good. The manager also gets to be reviewed by the subordinates anonymously and quickly every one knows where the trust is missing. This eliminates all the managers who are promoted by randomness, and really do not have any leadership skills but p…

Problem with 360s: at least in my experience, I've never seen people "done in" by their direct boss, because the boss wants has too much of a stake in the performance of those below him to be a total jackass. It's middle management and influential co-workers (people who are technically same-level but have more influence over those with power) that you have to watch out for. Much more common than the caricatured asshole boss (a rarity in my experience) is the "too nice" (often overburdened) hands-off boss who inadvertently leaves newbies to be eaten alive by co-workers. 360s are just going to make that sort of Lord of the Flies environment more common and harsher.

Re: Yes, Everyone Really Does Hate Performance Reviews

#22
At my previous job, I had a yearly performance review. It was that time of the year where my boss told me that he's glad to have me around, but that I should try to keep the procastrination under control. I really liked that. A serious, but amicable conversation, valuable in spite of the red tape.

I like a somewhat formal statement on whether people think I'm doing a good/bad job. It's also ammo when you're asking for a raise.

It's certainly not suitable to the startup model, but that's not what this article is about.

Post reply on HN