Live data from Hacker News

Micro v1.0 – a terminal-based text editor written in Go

github.com

21–30 of 47 posts

Re: Micro v1.0 – a terminal-based text editor written in Go

#22
post #21

Why does it seem like Go programmers need to include "in Go" on the tail end of product announcements?

There's also already a reasonably-popular Go project called "Micro," though honestly both projects could have picked better names.

https://github.com/micro

Re: Micro v1.0 – a terminal-based text editor written in Go

#23
post #21

Why does it seem like Go programmers need to include "in Go" on the tail end of product announcements?

because it targets a specific audience. people not interested in editors may look it up because they're interested in Go, and vice versa.

editors written in Rust also announce it proudly: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8734307, so do many other projects.

Re: Micro v1.0 – a terminal-based text editor written in Go

#25

just curious -- what motivated you to write a new text editor?

I know people for whom Vim was overwhelming to learn and they gave up or didn't use it properly. I'm trying to make an terminal-based editor which gives them as much as possible of the power of Vim or Emacs, while making it dead simple to learn and use.

Re: Micro v1.0 – a terminal-based text editor written in Go

#29
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The binary is unstripped. Strip it, and it loses ~3 MB.

also statically linked, at least on osx.

All go binaries are statically linked. It's supposed to be one of the selling points of the language.

Re: Micro v1.0 – a terminal-based text editor written in Go

#30
post #7

8.5Mb is a little too much for editor named micro. Whole DD-WRT/OpenWRT Linux Image is twice smaller.

Relative to: Atom, VS, Sublime Text, the mac Notes app, and modern hard drive sizes - it's pretty small.

No, it's not as small as Nano, but I have a hard time getting my hackles up over a single binary I can download in under a second.

Post reply on HN