How would a person be able to avoid this?
FreeSense: Indoor Human Identification with WiFi Signals
21–30 of 42 posts
Re: FreeSense: Indoor Human Identification with WiFi Signals
#22Re: FreeSense: Indoor Human Identification with WiFi Signals
#23Is this much different to FIND?
It's not doing internal positioning with Channel State Information (CSI), but there are folks that are [1]. The approach in FIND is different [2] - FIND just uses RSSI+MAC information which works great on mobile devices and simple esp8266 chips and doesn't require code for the specific network interface. As far as I know you have to write some network card specific code to be able to use CSI.
Re: FreeSense: Indoor Human Identification with WiFi Signals
#24Re: FreeSense: Indoor Human Identification with WiFi Signals
#25Re: FreeSense: Indoor Human Identification with WiFi Signals
#26How would a person be able to avoid this?
Re: FreeSense: Indoor Human Identification with WiFi Signals
#27Re: FreeSense: Indoor Human Identification with WiFi Signals
#28Re: FreeSense: Indoor Human Identification with WiFi Signals
#29http://www.securityelectronicsandnetworks.com/articles/2014/...
http://www.xandem.com/motion-detection
Compared to crappy PIRs from companies like ADT, it is great stuff.
Re: FreeSense: Indoor Human Identification with WiFi Signals
#30Is this much different to FIND?
FIND author here. It's not doing internal positioning with Channel State Information (CSI), but there are folks that are [1]. The approach in FIND is different [2] - FIND just uses RSSI+MAC information which works great on mobile devices and simple esp8266 chips and doesn't require code for the specific network interface. As far as I know you have to write some network card specific code to be able to use CSI. [1] ht…