Live data from Hacker News

French police make woman remove clothing on Nice beach following burkini ban

theguardian.com

21–30 of 36 posts

Re: French police make woman remove clothing on Nice beach following burkini ban

#21
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Shame on who ? I'm French and by no way I support this. There is still death penalty on some US states but I'm not shaming every US citizens. There is only 15 towns concerned by this ban, that's not representative

I can't speak for the OP, but in my experience when people say something like this, they are generally referring to the government and the people who support such things, with the understanding that with any sort of collective abbreviation like this, there is an understanding that not everyone included in that group was involved with or supports such rules.

I agree and pretty sure that was OP POV but that's the same as saying shame on Muslim because of IS attacks. Including a much larger population just because of a single shared characteristic like citizenship or religion is IMHO not a good thing. I felt accused by OP even if he didn't intended to

Re: French police make woman remove clothing on Nice beach following burkini ban

#22
post #2

This kind of thing is just amazing to me as an American. I'm an atheist, but people have a fundamental right to express their personal values in their dress and practice their religion. France's bans on religious expression in the name of "secularism" are just a different kind of theocracy.

Practically every country has some kind of laws that limit what clothing people choose. Nudism culture, to take a obvious one, has been in constant conflict with laws that restrict the fundamental right to express personal values through clothing choice. Thus I don't know if its fair then to call every country a kind of theocracies, through I guess cultural values is very much intertwined with religious values.

Re: French police make woman remove clothing on Nice beach following burkini ban

#23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I believe that preventing the tension buildup that leads to violence is a reasonable cause for state intervention. The ban of the burkini is a misguided attempt to alleviate that tension. Although this is very sad to write, nowadays in France being very publicly muslim increases that tension. Using burkinis that contrast your being covered whilst the rest of the people on the beach/pool are semi-naked is included in…

> The ban of the burkini is a misguided attempt to alleviate that tension. Its so badly and obviously misguided as a technique to that intent that it is simply implausible that that is the actual intent, specifically in that it does the exact opposite , and that it is transparently obvious that it would do so, and that even if you might excuse someone for failing to recognize this in a vacuum, the fact that a number…

So then willful ignorance must be the reason. But I'd bet it also has on political points with the right wing part of the electorate...

Re: French police make woman remove clothing on Nice beach following burkini ban

#24
post #2

This kind of thing is just amazing to me as an American. I'm an atheist, but people have a fundamental right to express their personal values in their dress and practice their religion. France's bans on religious expression in the name of "secularism" are just a different kind of theocracy.

> but people have a fundamental right to express their personal values in their dress and practice their religion

Yes, like the fundamental right to wear saggy pants in some american cities ... where they are outlawed. I'm amused every time Americans boast about being living in land of freedom ,when your government is as despotic as the rest.

I certainly don't want my country to turn into that racially divided & violent country that is US.

Re: French police make woman remove clothing on Nice beach following burkini ban

#26
post #2

This kind of thing is just amazing to me as an American. I'm an atheist, but people have a fundamental right to express their personal values in their dress and practice their religion. France's bans on religious expression in the name of "secularism" are just a different kind of theocracy.

> but people have a fundamental right to express their personal values in their dress and practice their religion Yes, like the fundamental right to wear saggy pants in some american cities ... where they are outlawed. I'm amused every time Americans boast about being living in land of freedom ,when your government is as despotic as the rest. I certainly don't want my country to turn into that racially divided & viol…

> Yes, like the fundamental right to wear saggy pants in some american cities ... where they are outlawed.

Actually, our (lower) courts have ruled that these laws are unconstitutional. So yes, Americans have the fundamental freedom to wear burkinis and baggy pants.

So, while small, local governments are free to enact repressive laws, Americans have the luxury of being protected by pro-liberty groups that will come in and fight against laws that violate the constitution.

Re: French police make woman remove clothing on Nice beach following burkini ban

#27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I believe that preventing the tension buildup that leads to violence is a reasonable cause for state intervention. The ban of the burkini is a misguided attempt to alleviate that tension. Although this is very sad to write, nowadays in France being very publicly muslim increases that tension. Using burkinis that contrast your being covered whilst the rest of the people on the beach/pool are semi-naked is included in…

> The ban of the burkini is a misguided attempt to alleviate that tension. Its so badly and obviously misguided as a technique to that intent that it is simply implausible that that is the actual intent, specifically in that it does the exact opposite , and that it is transparently obvious that it would do so, and that even if you might excuse someone for failing to recognize this in a vacuum, the fact that a number…

It's almost like France is actively encouraging terrorist attacks by giving fundamentalist groups ammunition for recruitment and radicalization.

These stories of oppression spread throughout the world and we know they are used by groups like ISIS to spread their message.

Re: French police make woman remove clothing on Nice beach following burkini ban

#28

I love it, I feel like a saw an article linked through hn about the fact that so al-queda and extremist groups supposedly want exactly this to happen. Something along the lines of how this was a strategy for recruitment.

It is fallacious to argue that if X is what the enemy wants us to do, then X is a bad action. X might be the best course of action on where we are, the problem being the short-sightedness that took us to this place in the first place (thinking like in chess - you limited your better options with earlier moves). EDIT: Of course, if the enemy is better at the long game, and succeeded in taking us to here, what's to ass…

Armies need resources; people are resources. So the argument isn't, "X is what the enemy wants," it's, "X allows the enemy to recruit more troops."

Thinking like chess -- you'd probably avoid moves that gave the opponent more pieces. Especially when those piece spawn by your king.

Re: French police make woman remove clothing on Nice beach following burkini ban

#29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> but people have a fundamental right to express their personal values in their dress and practice their religion Yes, like the fundamental right to wear saggy pants in some american cities ... where they are outlawed. I'm amused every time Americans boast about being living in land of freedom ,when your government is as despotic as the rest. I certainly don't want my country to turn into that racially divided & viol…

> Yes, like the fundamental right to wear saggy pants in some american cities ... where they are outlawed. Actually, our (lower) courts have ruled that these laws are unconstitutional. So yes, Americans have the fundamental freedom to wear burkinis and baggy pants. So, while small, local governments are free to enact repressive laws, Americans have the luxury of being protected by pro-liberty groups that will come in…

Your pro-liberty groups apparently didn't prevent America from becoming this racist nation. Take care of your black community instead of boasting about your moral superiority. We don't kill black people for the sake of it here.

Re: French police make woman remove clothing on Nice beach following burkini ban

#30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is fallacious to argue that if X is what the enemy wants us to do, then X is a bad action. X might be the best course of action on where we are, the problem being the short-sightedness that took us to this place in the first place (thinking like in chess - you limited your better options with earlier moves). EDIT: Of course, if the enemy is better at the long game, and succeeded in taking us to here, what's to ass…

Armies need resources; people are resources. So the argument isn't, "X is what the enemy wants," it's, "X allows the enemy to recruit more troops." Thinking like chess -- you'd probably avoid moves that gave the opponent more pieces. Especially when those piece spawn by your king.

I was speaking abstractly, not about the OP theme - a logical fallacy is a logical fallacy, even if it provides a useful heuristic.

Even if the opponent wants you to do something, it might be the best for you.

Think about the game of chicken [1] in game theory. If the opponent puts on a blindfold and makes a precommitment, they want you to swerve - that's what they want! But it would be foolish not to swerve and crash. Once the opponent precommits, you have already lost, and you decide how much both take home.

That's even without accounting for different target outcomes or one of the sides knowing more about the outcomes, that might be in play in the OP discussion.

Example of the first, for the OP discussion: if the mayor that banned the burkini only looked after votes, "That's what the terrorists want!" yeah, but for the mayor, short-time the outcome is good, and long-time, other might solve the issue.

Example of the second, for the OP discussion: if the terrorists want us to make a step that would be their unavoidable demise, but only us would know it, "That's what the terrorists want!" yeah, but they are clueless and/or crazy, our choice is good.

Anyway this is all just for the sake of imagining and hypothesizing :)

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken_(game)

Post reply on HN