Earlier quoted context omitted.
Shame on who ? I'm French and by no way I support this. There is still death penalty on some US states but I'm not shaming every US citizens. There is only 15 towns concerned by this ban, that's not representative
I can't speak for the OP, but in my experience when people say something like this, they are generally referring to the government and the people who support such things, with the understanding that with any sort of collective abbreviation like this, there is an understanding that not everyone included in that group was involved with or supports such rules.
French police make woman remove clothing on Nice beach following burkini ban
21–30 of 36 posts
Re: French police make woman remove clothing on Nice beach following burkini ban
#22This kind of thing is just amazing to me as an American. I'm an atheist, but people have a fundamental right to express their personal values in their dress and practice their religion. France's bans on religious expression in the name of "secularism" are just a different kind of theocracy.
Re: French police make woman remove clothing on Nice beach following burkini ban
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
I believe that preventing the tension buildup that leads to violence is a reasonable cause for state intervention. The ban of the burkini is a misguided attempt to alleviate that tension. Although this is very sad to write, nowadays in France being very publicly muslim increases that tension. Using burkinis that contrast your being covered whilst the rest of the people on the beach/pool are semi-naked is included in…
> The ban of the burkini is a misguided attempt to alleviate that tension. Its so badly and obviously misguided as a technique to that intent that it is simply implausible that that is the actual intent, specifically in that it does the exact opposite , and that it is transparently obvious that it would do so, and that even if you might excuse someone for failing to recognize this in a vacuum, the fact that a number…
Re: French police make woman remove clothing on Nice beach following burkini ban
#24This kind of thing is just amazing to me as an American. I'm an atheist, but people have a fundamental right to express their personal values in their dress and practice their religion. France's bans on religious expression in the name of "secularism" are just a different kind of theocracy.
Yes, like the fundamental right to wear saggy pants in some american cities ... where they are outlawed. I'm amused every time Americans boast about being living in land of freedom ,when your government is as despotic as the rest.
I certainly don't want my country to turn into that racially divided & violent country that is US.
Re: French police make woman remove clothing on Nice beach following burkini ban
#25Black mark against the French. Shame on them.
Re: French police make woman remove clothing on Nice beach following burkini ban
#26This kind of thing is just amazing to me as an American. I'm an atheist, but people have a fundamental right to express their personal values in their dress and practice their religion. France's bans on religious expression in the name of "secularism" are just a different kind of theocracy.
> but people have a fundamental right to express their personal values in their dress and practice their religion Yes, like the fundamental right to wear saggy pants in some american cities ... where they are outlawed. I'm amused every time Americans boast about being living in land of freedom ,when your government is as despotic as the rest. I certainly don't want my country to turn into that racially divided & viol…
Actually, our (lower) courts have ruled that these laws are unconstitutional. So yes, Americans have the fundamental freedom to wear burkinis and baggy pants.
So, while small, local governments are free to enact repressive laws, Americans have the luxury of being protected by pro-liberty groups that will come in and fight against laws that violate the constitution.
Re: French police make woman remove clothing on Nice beach following burkini ban
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
I believe that preventing the tension buildup that leads to violence is a reasonable cause for state intervention. The ban of the burkini is a misguided attempt to alleviate that tension. Although this is very sad to write, nowadays in France being very publicly muslim increases that tension. Using burkinis that contrast your being covered whilst the rest of the people on the beach/pool are semi-naked is included in…
> The ban of the burkini is a misguided attempt to alleviate that tension. Its so badly and obviously misguided as a technique to that intent that it is simply implausible that that is the actual intent, specifically in that it does the exact opposite , and that it is transparently obvious that it would do so, and that even if you might excuse someone for failing to recognize this in a vacuum, the fact that a number…
These stories of oppression spread throughout the world and we know they are used by groups like ISIS to spread their message.
Re: French police make woman remove clothing on Nice beach following burkini ban
#28I love it, I feel like a saw an article linked through hn about the fact that so al-queda and extremist groups supposedly want exactly this to happen. Something along the lines of how this was a strategy for recruitment.
It is fallacious to argue that if X is what the enemy wants us to do, then X is a bad action. X might be the best course of action on where we are, the problem being the short-sightedness that took us to this place in the first place (thinking like in chess - you limited your better options with earlier moves). EDIT: Of course, if the enemy is better at the long game, and succeeded in taking us to here, what's to ass…
Thinking like chess -- you'd probably avoid moves that gave the opponent more pieces. Especially when those piece spawn by your king.
Re: French police make woman remove clothing on Nice beach following burkini ban
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
> but people have a fundamental right to express their personal values in their dress and practice their religion Yes, like the fundamental right to wear saggy pants in some american cities ... where they are outlawed. I'm amused every time Americans boast about being living in land of freedom ,when your government is as despotic as the rest. I certainly don't want my country to turn into that racially divided & viol…
> Yes, like the fundamental right to wear saggy pants in some american cities ... where they are outlawed. Actually, our (lower) courts have ruled that these laws are unconstitutional. So yes, Americans have the fundamental freedom to wear burkinis and baggy pants. So, while small, local governments are free to enact repressive laws, Americans have the luxury of being protected by pro-liberty groups that will come in…
Re: French police make woman remove clothing on Nice beach following burkini ban
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is fallacious to argue that if X is what the enemy wants us to do, then X is a bad action. X might be the best course of action on where we are, the problem being the short-sightedness that took us to this place in the first place (thinking like in chess - you limited your better options with earlier moves). EDIT: Of course, if the enemy is better at the long game, and succeeded in taking us to here, what's to ass…
Armies need resources; people are resources. So the argument isn't, "X is what the enemy wants," it's, "X allows the enemy to recruit more troops." Thinking like chess -- you'd probably avoid moves that gave the opponent more pieces. Especially when those piece spawn by your king.
Even if the opponent wants you to do something, it might be the best for you.
Think about the game of chicken [1] in game theory. If the opponent puts on a blindfold and makes a precommitment, they want you to swerve - that's what they want! But it would be foolish not to swerve and crash. Once the opponent precommits, you have already lost, and you decide how much both take home.
That's even without accounting for different target outcomes or one of the sides knowing more about the outcomes, that might be in play in the OP discussion.
Example of the first, for the OP discussion: if the mayor that banned the burkini only looked after votes, "That's what the terrorists want!" yeah, but for the mayor, short-time the outcome is good, and long-time, other might solve the issue.
Example of the second, for the OP discussion: if the terrorists want us to make a step that would be their unavoidable demise, but only us would know it, "That's what the terrorists want!" yeah, but they are clueless and/or crazy, our choice is good.
Anyway this is all just for the sake of imagining and hypothesizing :)